Set as Homepage - Add to Favorites

日韩欧美成人一区二区三区免费-日韩欧美成人免费中文字幕-日韩欧美成人免费观看-日韩欧美成人免-日韩欧美不卡一区-日韩欧美爱情中文字幕在线

【cerita lucah 19 years old】The proposal to do away with net neutrality is worse than you think

Few who follow the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and cerita lucah 19 years oldthe history of its efforts to enshrine network neutrality rules into law were surprised yesterday when Chairman Ajit Pai announced that he would make public a proposal to deregulate broadband Internet access by “reclassifying” it as an information service under the Communications Act of 1934.

But many expected the Chairman to at least propose retaining some of the rules that protect consumers and competition online, like a prohibition against broadband providers blocking or throttling online content and services. After all, since 2002 FCC chairs of both parties believed that at a minimum, FCC policy should ensure that consumers are able to access the content, applications, and services of their choosing without interference by gatekeeping broadband providers.

Not Pai. In doing away with the 2015 rules that prohibit broadband providers from discriminating against or favoring certain content, applications and services (that is, no blocking, no throttling, no fast lanes and a general rule against discrimination), Pai has radically departed from bipartisan FCC precedent. This opens the door for companies like Comcast, AT&T, Verizon, and Charter to pick winners and losers on the Internet by controlling which online companies get faster and better quality of service and at what price.

Sounds bad, right? Believe it or not, the proposed order is worse than that.

The proposed order would leave broadband providers largely if not completely free of oversight

While there’s a lot of focus on repeal of the rules, even more damaging is the proposal to reverse the FCC’s decision under Tom Wheeler to classify broadband Internet access as an essential “telecommunications service” subject to Title II of the Communications Act. Without such a ruling, the 2015 rules would not have been possible in the first place.

Reversing that classification would do more than invalidate the rules. It would also remove the FCC’s ability to protect consumers and competition in the broadband market. Among other things, Title II gives the FCC the legal power to protect consumers from fraudulent billing, price gouging, anticompetitive behavior, data breaches, and other practices that violate users’ privacy.

Chairman Pai’s answer is that the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) “will once again be able to police ISPs, protect consumers, and promote competition, just as it did before 2015.” What he doesn’t say is that the FTC, unlike the FCC, doesn’t have the power to make rules that protect consumers and innovators beforethey are harmed. Nor does he say that the FTC’s authority wouldn’t prohibit fast lanes, blocking or throttling so long as the broadband provider tells you it’s engaging in those practices.

Mashable Trend Report Decode what’s viral, what’s next, and what it all means. Sign up for Mashable’s weekly Trend Report newsletter. By clicking Sign Me Up, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Thanks for signing up!

Finally, there’s nothing the FTC can do if one day your broadband provider decides to double its prices. As FTC Commissioner Terrell McSweeny testified earlier this month: “[i]t is wrong to assume that a framework that relies solely on backward-looking consumer protection and antitrust enforcement can provide the same assurances to innovators and consumers as the forward-looking rules contained in the FCC’s Open Internet Order.”

Moreover, it’s unclear whether the FTC will be able to police some broadband providers at all.Still pending in the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals is a case that holds that if a broadband provider also provides a service regulated under Title II (for example, landline and mobile phone service), then the FTC has no legal authority to oversee its practices. Should that case stand, broadband providers, nearly all which provide some Title II services, would be entirely free of oversight from both the FCC and FTC.

The proposed order would prohibit states and localities from protecting their citizens

Not content to repeal the pro-consumer net neutrality rules and neuter his agency, Pai is also proposing to prohibit states and localities from adopting their own broadband consumer protection laws, including laws that protect consumer privacy.

In some circumstances, a federal agency like the FCC can “preempt” state and local laws and rules when they are inconsistent with federal laws and rules. Comcast and Verizon asked for this preemption after Congress repealed the FCC’s strong broadband privacy rules and some 16 states introduced laws that would protect users’ privacy. As usual, Pai gave these powerful companies exactly what they asked for.

The hypocrisy is staggering. When the FCC in 2015 voted to help consumers by pre-empting the laws of two states that prohibit communities from expanding and building their own broadband networks, Pai dissented vociferously. In this case, where the FCC is removingpro-consumer protections, Pai is delighted to preempt the states from ensuring that their citizens are protected from anti-consumer and anti-competitive practices of broadband companies. The result? Broadband providers win and you lose.

What’s next?

Pai’s proposed order is now “circulating” among the other four Commissioners, some of whom may offer edits to the document. For the next two weeks, the FCC will take public comment on the proposal and then one week before the FCC’s December 14 meeting, it will go into its “Sunshine” period, in which comment from the public is prohibited.

Pai made clear that he doesn’t value public comments, so the best thing for you to do is to contact your representatives in Congress. Now. Just yesterday, some 175,000 calls opposing the proposal went to members of Congress. The goal is to get Republicans to urge Pai not to proceed once they recognize that repeal of the net neutrality rules, like repeal of the broadband privacy rules before it, is extremely unpopular and will hurt them at the ballot box in 2018.

If that doesn’t happen, the FCC will vote on Pai’s proposed order on December 14, where it is expected to pass. After that, get ready for a bunch of lawsuits and at least an 18-month to two-year wait for a court to decide the fate of the rules and the FCC’s ability to protect consumers and competition.

Gigi Sohn is a Fellow with Georgetown Law’s Institute for Technology Law & Policy, the Open Society Foundations and Mozilla. Sheserved as Counselor to former FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler from November 2013-December 2016.


Featured Video For You
This visually stunning concert hall has perfect acoustics

0.1313s , 10024 kb

Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【cerita lucah 19 years old】The proposal to do away with net neutrality is worse than you think,Public Opinion Flash  

Sitemap

Top 主站蜘蛛池模板: 成年女人色毛片免费 | 欧美一区二区三区四区黑人 | 激情国产一区二区三区四区小说 | 亚洲精品久久久久久一区 | 欧美日韩综合无码中文字幕 | 国产成人无码区免费内射一片 | 国产一区二区高清视频 | 国产精品毛片一区二区三 | 精品国产乱码久久久久久蜜桃网站 | 亚洲精品成人在线 | 久久久久99精品成人片牛牛影视 | 精品无码一区二区三区网雨 | 国产又色又爽在线观看 | 日本万能不卡 | 国产日韩av无码免 | 国产成人无码a区在线观看导航 | 一区二区精品日韩欧美在 | 国产熟妇BBWBBWBBW歼尸 | 丁香婷婷深情五月深爱六月 | 亚洲一区二区女搞男 | 波多野结衣一区二区三区在线观看 | 久久国产精品张柏芝 | 人体女人xx | av无码不卡免费影视 | 无码精品人妻一区二区三区夜夜嗨 | 亚洲 欧美 唯美 国产 伦 综合 | 中文乱码字幕无线观看2024 | 五月天婷婷天天综合入口 | 日韩精品一区二区三区免费在线 | 亚洲欧美日韩久久精品 | 可以直接看的av网址站 | 久久久久亚洲av无码蜜臀按摩 | 国产超清无码专区 | 久久亚洲精品国产亚洲老地址 | 国产制服国产制服一区二区 | 91久久北条麻妃一区二区三区 | 国产精品麻豆 | 在线日韩视频 | 欧美日韩另类精品一区二区三区 | 日本不卡一区二区三区在线 | av三级片黄片在线播放 |