Set as Homepage - Add to Favorites

日韩欧美成人一区二区三区免费-日韩欧美成人免费中文字幕-日韩欧美成人免费观看-日韩欧美成人免-日韩欧美不卡一区-日韩欧美爱情中文字幕在线

【meth sex video porn】Reckless EPA news release distorts the new, grim U.S. Climate Report

There's something truly out of place amid a slew of uneventful news releases on meth sex video pornthe Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) website: Six bizarre sentences, accusing the Obama Administration of distorting climate science.

Posted to the federal agency's site on Wednesday, the brief missive contends that Obama's scientists improperly influenced the new congressionally-mandated National Climate Assessment by focusing on the "worst-case scenario" for climate change this century.

The release, which cited as its corroborating evidence an article from the conservative website The Daily Caller, promotes a profoundly misleading, oversimplified, and politicized view of the climate report, which involved the work of 13 government agencies and 300 climate scientists.

The decision to publish this as an official release -- from the chief office of a government agency responsible for the nation's environmental oversight -- is rash, and problematic, at best.

"For the EPA’s political leadership to do this is, one might say, deplorable," Joe Goffman, a former EPA senior counsel in the Office of Air and Radiation, said in an interview.

"They’ve done something really flagrant as part of the campaign to foster misinformation to the public about climate science," Goffman, now the executive director of Harvard Law School’s Environmental Law Program, added. "I would argue they committed a genuinely cardinal sin with respect to the values of scientific integrity and the trustworthiness they owe the public."

Just how flagrantly misinformed is the EPA's release?

The current incarnation of the EPA is claiming that President Barack Obama's science advisor and current Harvard professor, John Holdren, used a routine May 2015 memo to instruct the report's scientists to focus on the "worst case" climate scenario, meaning the continued release of high amounts of greenhouse gases over the coming decades.

The Climate Assessment, however, considered a variety of scenarios about the future climate based upon different carbon emission possibilities -- just as it has in the past.

The highest, or "worst-case," is if trends continue as they are, allowing for historically unprecedented amounts of heat-trapping greenhouse gases to accumulate in the atmosphere. This scenario is formally called "RCP 8.5." The other major scenarios, contingent upon a lowering of greenhouse gas emissions, are RCP 6.0, 4.5 and 2.6 (with 2.6 being the lowest).

In the last two national climate assessments (2014 and 2018), scientists chose RCP 4.5 and 8.5 scenarios as the main, or most likely, based upon the amount of greenhouse gas emissions being expelled into the air -- but it certainly did not ignore the lowest possibility (RCP 2.6). In fact, 4.5 is a low-end scenario, too.

"Wow, this EPA press release really is the express train to crazy town," Andrew Dessler, a professor of atmospheric sciences at Texas A&M University, said over email.

"What The Daily Caller and EPA clearly want readers to think is that Holdren told the assessment team to look ONLY at the worst case scenario. That's obviously false."

Mashable Light Speed Want more out-of-this world tech, space and science stories? Sign up for Mashable's weekly Light Speed newsletter. By clicking Sign Me Up, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Thanks for signing up!
"This EPA press release really is the express train to crazy town"

What's more, the lowest of the low emissions scenario, RCP 2.6, is growing increasingly unlikely. Meeting that would require net-zero greenhouse gas emissions globally in the second half of this century, Bob Kopp, Director of the Institute of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Sciences at Rutgers University, explained over email.

That's "more ambitious than current policy, and in the opposite direction from that which current federal policy is taking us," Kopp said.

Original image replaced with Mashable logoOriginal image has been replaced. Credit: Mashable

As it is, "RCP 4.5 requires substantial mitigation policy to achieve," noted Kopp. And, critically, we are now on a track for the higher-end, worst-case scenario -- whether EPA leadership wishes to accept the data or not.

"Historical CO2 emissions have been closer to RCP 8.5 than to any other scenario," said Kopp.

SEE ALSO: This scientist keeps winning money from people who bet against climate change

Where we're ultimately headed may be the worst-case scenario, or fall somewhere in between RCP 8.5 and 4.5. That's why the climate assessment considered a range of possibilities -- which is what Holdren recommended.

There's simply no deception, nor ploy here.

"This is a standard and common-sense approach --because we don't know what path emissions will follow, you try to estimate what's the best case and worst-case and assume that reality will fall somewhere in between them," said Dessler. "That's what the memo says to do and that's what the assessment did and that seems completely reasonable to me." 

This makes the EPA's news release all the more bizarre. It appears as if it's coming from a whimsical social media post, or a pundit with an animosity towards Obama, or Obama's environmental policy.

"This is an official statement of the U.S. EPA," noted Goffman. "Here you have the government doing something that's affirmatively misleading."

For nearly two years now, the EPA has made efforts to both hide information about and mislead the public about the truth behind climate science.

The agency has completely eliminated its climate change webpages, and in March sent its staff "talking points" on how to speak about climate research -- encouraging scientists to emphasize any uncertainties in the science.

The latest U.S. Climate Assessment lays out how every portion of the U.S. will be impacted by climate change under the likely emissions scenarios.

"The impacts of climate change are already being felt in communities across the country," the report reads. "More frequent and intense extreme weather and climate-related events, as well as changes in average climate conditions, are expected to continue to damage infrastructure, ecosystems, and social systems that provide essential benefits to communities."

The EPA's chief, former coal lobbyist Andrew Wheeler, has publicly questioned the report, though he hasn't finished reviewing it.

President Donald Trump simply dismisses both the report and climate science that is agreed upon by scientists globally. The EPA's release -- which includes a picture of Obama and Holdren -- is blatantly an attempt to promote the Trump Administration's denial of accumulating climate science... but a sloppy one.

"I think the transparently misleading nature of this [EPA] argument underscores how few legitimate arguments the Administration has against this powerful report," said Dessler.


Featured Video For You
Ever wonder how the universe might end?

0.1464s , 14232.484375 kb

Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【meth sex video porn】Reckless EPA news release distorts the new, grim U.S. Climate Report,Public Opinion Flash  

Sitemap

Top 主站蜘蛛池模板: 亚洲天天做日日做天天看2018 | 国产欧洲青草依依 | 国产裸拍裸体女 | 一级一级毛片免费播放 | 成人网址欧美亚洲 | 波多野结衣电影在线观看电影免费在线观看 | 亚洲第一黄色网址 | 国产亚洲人成无码网在线观看 | 久久久精品成人免费观看 | 麻豆一精品传媒卡一卡二传媒 | 日日夜夜免费精品综合网 | av大片在线无码永久免费 | 精品人妻少妇一区二区三区 | 波多野结衣与老人中出 | 国产精品无码午夜福利免费看 | 久久久精品国产免费观看同学 | 无码av一区二区三区免费播放 | a级日本乱理伦片免费观看 a级日本乱理伦片免费入口 | 亚洲综合激情另类小说区 | 欧美人妇无码精品久久 | 九一国产在线观看 | 国产婷婷久久综合五月欲色扒 | 日本无码蜜桃波多野结衣 | 欧美成人一区二区三区视频免费 | 中文有码人妻字幕在线 | 亚欧国产国产制服无码视频 | japanese日本丰满少妇 | 精品国产精品人妻久久无码五月天 | ⅴ无码专区久久精品国产 | 午夜福利1000集无码 | 成人免费无码动漫h在线观看 | 在线观看在线播放一区二区三区 | 熟女一区二区三区视频网站 | 国产乱子伦在线播放即将上线 | 国产制服丝袜亚洲高清 | 又长又粗又爽又高潮的视频 | 久久99精品久久久久久无毒不卡 | 狠狠色丁香九九婷婷综合五月 | 成A人片在线播放器 | 日本三区四区免费高清不卡 | av喷水高潮喷水在线观看 |