Set as Homepage - Add to Favorites

日韩欧美成人一区二区三区免费-日韩欧美成人免费中文字幕-日韩欧美成人免费观看-日韩欧美成人免-日韩欧美不卡一区-日韩欧美爱情中文字幕在线

【sex toys video red】Scott Pruitt proposes EPA limit agency's use of scientific studies

In regulating air and sex toys video redwater pollution in the U.S., the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) leans on scientific studies to guide the writing of regulations. The agency is still relying on landmark studies, such as one conducted by Harvard University in 1993, that established the link between air pollution and premature deaths, in order to justify air pollution rules.

However, in a move claimed to make the agency more "transparent," embattled EPA administrator Scott Pruitt announced on Tuesday a proposal to prevent the use of studies that don't make their underlying data publicly available.

SEE ALSO: Scott Pruitt used a clean water law to give a staffer a $56,765 raise

This might seem like a common-sense proposal, but it could have major ramifications on how the agency governs everything from water quality to auto tailpipe emissions. Public health studies, especially ones that follow subjects over long periods of time, typically have participants sign confidentiality agreements with the researchers, and studies are published and used by the government without requiring the data be turned over. Court decisions have backed up the governments ability to use such studies, which constitutes a potential impediment to this new proposal.

Under the proposed new rule, the EPA would bar the use of such studies when formulating regulations. The ink hasn't dried, however -- a 30-day comment period has begun and if finalized, the the rule will likely be subject to lawsuits from environmental and scientific groups.

The rule proposal fulfills a longtime goal of some conservative politicians, who believe that the EPA has gone too far in its efforts to reduce pollution.

“Today is a red-letter day. It’s a banner day,” Pruitt said in a hastily announced ceremony at EPA headquarters, with few if any reporters present. “The science that we use is going to be transparent. It’s going to be reproducible.”

Tim Huelskamp, president of the Heartland Institute, a free-market think tank that has worked closely with the Trump White House on climate issues, endorsed the EPA's move.

Mashable Light Speed Want more out-of-this world tech, space and science stories? Sign up for Mashable's weekly Light Speed newsletter. By clicking Sign Me Up, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Thanks for signing up!
Mashable ImageA factory emits smoke on January 18, 2018 from Newark, New Jersey. Credit: Kena Betancur/VIEWpress/Corbis via Getty Images

"For decades, the EPA has improperly claimed massive power to regulate nearly every aspect of our economy and lives. It is long overdue that the EPA should make such data and collection methods available for public review and analysis," he said in a statement.

The new rule amounts to a federal agency's implementation of a bill that was proposed, but never passed, by both houses of Congress. That legislation was sponsored by Republican Rep. Lamar Smith of Texas, who praised Pruitt at the announcement ceremony Tuesday.

“For too long, the EPA has issued rules and regulations based on data that has been withheld from the American people," Smith said. "Today, Administrator Pruitt rightfully is changing business as usual and putting a stop to hidden agendas.”

Scientists are unified in their opposition to the proposal, warning that it would severely limit the research the agency could draw from and unravel bedrock public health protections dating back decades.

On Monday, nearly 1,000 scientists signed onto a letter to Pruitt urging him not to move forward with the proposed rule.

"... Many public health studies cannot be replicated, as doing so would require intentionally and unethically exposing people and the environment to harmful contaminants or recreating one-time events (such as the Deepwater Horizon oil spill)," the letter states.

The letter continues:

There are ways to improve transparency in the decision making process, but restricting the use of science would improve neither transparency nor the quality of EPA decision making. If fully implemented, this proposal would greatly weaken EPA’s ability to comprehensively consider the scientific evidence across the full array of health effects studies. This would negatively impact EPA public protections that reduce levels of lead, harmful chemicals, and fine particle pollution, among others.

American Lung Association National President and CEO Harold P. Wimmer had a similar take.

“Today’s proposal would prevent the best science from informing policy decisions and result in weaker health safeguards. This approach must not stand.”

Pruitt may face questions about this proposed rule when he testifies before two House committees on Thursday, where he is likely to be pressed on his many ethical scandals that have come to light in the past two months.


Featured Video For You
The lake that reminds them of home

0.1863s , 14242.546875 kb

Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【sex toys video red】Scott Pruitt proposes EPA limit agency's use of scientific studies,Public Opinion Flash  

Sitemap

Top 主站蜘蛛池模板: 中国免费无码的网 | 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久蜜桃不卡 | 欧美日韩亚洲综合在线观看 | 波多野结衣hd系列在线播放 | 国产成人av区一区 | 亚洲天堂手机 天天综合网日 | 亚洲天堂一区二区久久 | 成人亚洲a片v一区二区三区麻豆 | 日韩一区二区三区高清 | 国产精品久久久久久亚洲小说 | 成人av在线 | 91精品国产午夜福利在线观看 | 青青草视频成年视频在緌观看详情介绍 | 国产乱人乱偷精品视频a人人澡 | 日韩精品在线观看高清视频 | 国产精品视频99 | 国产乱子乱人伦电影在线观看 | 国产精品高清一区二区三区不卡 | 成人做爰69片免费看网站 | chinese中国女人高潮丰满网站国产在线 chinese中国女人内谢 | 久久久久免费毛a片免费一瓶梅 | 国产成人片一级毛片真人特黄a一级片 | 国产高清国内精品福利色噜噜 | 国内精品A片久久久 | 欧美激情在线播放 | 亚洲无码电影免费在线 | 人体无码免费在线观看 | 欧美国产伦久久久久久 | 欧美日韩国产在线人成网站欧美日韩国产综合 | 亚洲午夜无码毛片AV久久久久久 | 欧美午夜理伦三级 | 久久久久久久久久久亚洲精品 | 人人视频精品 国产综合久久久久影院 | 亚洲日韩高清在线亚洲专区 | 中文字幕极速在线观看 | 美女扒开尿口给男人爽免费视频日韩欧美第一区二区三区 | 国产高清精品线久久 | 亚欧洲精品在线视频免费观看 | 国产不卡的一区二区三区四区 | 中文字幕一区二区三区视频在线 | 国产精品成人影院在线观看 |