Set as Homepage - Add to Favorites

日韩欧美成人一区二区三区免费-日韩欧美成人免费中文字幕-日韩欧美成人免费观看-日韩欧美成人免-日韩欧美不卡一区-日韩欧美爱情中文字幕在线

【sex toys video red】Scott Pruitt proposes EPA limit agency's use of scientific studies

In regulating air and sex toys video redwater pollution in the U.S., the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) leans on scientific studies to guide the writing of regulations. The agency is still relying on landmark studies, such as one conducted by Harvard University in 1993, that established the link between air pollution and premature deaths, in order to justify air pollution rules.

However, in a move claimed to make the agency more "transparent," embattled EPA administrator Scott Pruitt announced on Tuesday a proposal to prevent the use of studies that don't make their underlying data publicly available.

SEE ALSO: Scott Pruitt used a clean water law to give a staffer a $56,765 raise

This might seem like a common-sense proposal, but it could have major ramifications on how the agency governs everything from water quality to auto tailpipe emissions. Public health studies, especially ones that follow subjects over long periods of time, typically have participants sign confidentiality agreements with the researchers, and studies are published and used by the government without requiring the data be turned over. Court decisions have backed up the governments ability to use such studies, which constitutes a potential impediment to this new proposal.

Under the proposed new rule, the EPA would bar the use of such studies when formulating regulations. The ink hasn't dried, however -- a 30-day comment period has begun and if finalized, the the rule will likely be subject to lawsuits from environmental and scientific groups.

The rule proposal fulfills a longtime goal of some conservative politicians, who believe that the EPA has gone too far in its efforts to reduce pollution.

“Today is a red-letter day. It’s a banner day,” Pruitt said in a hastily announced ceremony at EPA headquarters, with few if any reporters present. “The science that we use is going to be transparent. It’s going to be reproducible.”

Tim Huelskamp, president of the Heartland Institute, a free-market think tank that has worked closely with the Trump White House on climate issues, endorsed the EPA's move.

Mashable Light Speed Want more out-of-this world tech, space and science stories? Sign up for Mashable's weekly Light Speed newsletter. By clicking Sign Me Up, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Thanks for signing up!
Mashable ImageA factory emits smoke on January 18, 2018 from Newark, New Jersey. Credit: Kena Betancur/VIEWpress/Corbis via Getty Images

"For decades, the EPA has improperly claimed massive power to regulate nearly every aspect of our economy and lives. It is long overdue that the EPA should make such data and collection methods available for public review and analysis," he said in a statement.

The new rule amounts to a federal agency's implementation of a bill that was proposed, but never passed, by both houses of Congress. That legislation was sponsored by Republican Rep. Lamar Smith of Texas, who praised Pruitt at the announcement ceremony Tuesday.

“For too long, the EPA has issued rules and regulations based on data that has been withheld from the American people," Smith said. "Today, Administrator Pruitt rightfully is changing business as usual and putting a stop to hidden agendas.”

Scientists are unified in their opposition to the proposal, warning that it would severely limit the research the agency could draw from and unravel bedrock public health protections dating back decades.

On Monday, nearly 1,000 scientists signed onto a letter to Pruitt urging him not to move forward with the proposed rule.

"... Many public health studies cannot be replicated, as doing so would require intentionally and unethically exposing people and the environment to harmful contaminants or recreating one-time events (such as the Deepwater Horizon oil spill)," the letter states.

The letter continues:

There are ways to improve transparency in the decision making process, but restricting the use of science would improve neither transparency nor the quality of EPA decision making. If fully implemented, this proposal would greatly weaken EPA’s ability to comprehensively consider the scientific evidence across the full array of health effects studies. This would negatively impact EPA public protections that reduce levels of lead, harmful chemicals, and fine particle pollution, among others.

American Lung Association National President and CEO Harold P. Wimmer had a similar take.

“Today’s proposal would prevent the best science from informing policy decisions and result in weaker health safeguards. This approach must not stand.”

Pruitt may face questions about this proposed rule when he testifies before two House committees on Thursday, where he is likely to be pressed on his many ethical scandals that have come to light in the past two months.


Featured Video For You
The lake that reminds them of home

0.1863s , 14242.546875 kb

Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【sex toys video red】Scott Pruitt proposes EPA limit agency's use of scientific studies,Public Opinion Flash  

Sitemap

Top 主站蜘蛛池模板: 久久久久中国男同gay片 | 国产另类综合欧美 | 国产国产成人久久精品性色 | 国产无遮挡A片无码免费 | 四虎影视精品 | jizz国产在线播放 | 国产婷婷色一区二区三 | 精品人妻少妇一级毛片免费 | 国产一区二区三区免费视频 | 欧美自拍在线综合图区 | 欧美日韩在线精品一区二区三区激情福利综合 | 91精品午夜小视频在线观看性色 | 成人精品一区二区三区在线观看 | 午夜性色一区二区三区不卡视频 | 谁有色网址 | 美女裸胸不打马赛克 | 久久精品国产免费看片 | 国产精品久久久久无码人妻网站 | 69久久无码一区人妻A片 | 麻豆视传媒官网进入 | 伊人网综合在线观看 | 人与动动物xxxx毛片人与 | 国产视频一区二区三区在线免费观看 | 国产婷婷色一区二区三区 | 波多野结衣中文字幕无遮挡 | 国产69久久精品成人看 | 18女下面流水不遮图免费图 | 亚洲精品久久麻豆蜜桃 | 国产福利资源 | 久久久91精品国产一区二区三 | 日日摸天天摸97狠狠婷婷 | 欧美特大黄一级aa片片免费 | 欧美一区在线观看视频 | 国产精品视频久久久久久 | 国产一在线精品一区 | 久久人妻一区二区三区免费 | 国产精品人妻一码二码 | 一女被两男吃奶添下A片免费网站 | 亚洲成眠在线观看毛卡片 | 精品无码久久久久久尤物 | 成年人免费网站视频 |