Set as Homepage - Add to Favorites

日韩欧美成人一区二区三区免费-日韩欧美成人免费中文字幕-日韩欧美成人免费观看-日韩欧美成人免-日韩欧美不卡一区-日韩欧美爱情中文字幕在线

【monster girl pussy sex video】The Google v. Uber lawsuit is confusing, until you watch 'Silicon Valley'

Google and monster girl pussy sex videoUber are set to duke it out in court, and the fight is far from simple. The good news is, though, that as art imitates life which then often imitates art, HBO's Silicon Valleycan help you understand this quarrel.

On Thursday, Alphabet (Google's parent company) announced that it's taking Uber to court over self-driving car technology that it claims a former employee stole to start another company, which Uber then bought because of the technology that person allegedly stole.

SEE ALSO: Inside Uber: Women either 'drink the Kool-aid' or suffer

Cases like this are confusing from the get-go, but all the moving parts make this one particularly hard to follow. Silicon Valleyisn't a perfect apples-to-apples comparison, but the major issues at hand are similar enough to provide some idea of what's actually going on here. At stake is technology that is key to self-driving cars, which Google, Uber and many other companies are betting on.

Just remember that, in the end, this all comes down to money.

The setup

In this case, Google is Hooli, which is basically how the show portrays Hooli anyways.

Inside of Google, there is Waymo, its self-driving car operation. Inside Hooli, there is nucleus, its attempt at developing advanced compression software.

At Waymo, there was an engineer named Anthony Levandowski, who helped develop important technology for Waymo. He was kind of a big deal there.

Levandowski then left to start Otto, a company that specialized in autonomous trucks. Uber acquired Otto for a price tag reported to be around $680 million. Google claims in the lawsuit that Uber bought Otto "after only six months of official existence."

In Silicon Valley, this situation roughly equates to the show's main character: Richard Hendricks. Refresher/spoiler: Hendricks leaves Hooli after having developed a compression algorithm that could change the game for the internet.

Mashable Trend Report Decode what’s viral, what’s next, and what it all means. Sign up for Mashable’s weekly Trend Report newsletter. By clicking Sign Me Up, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Thanks for signing up!

Hendricks then starts Pied Piper, which doesn't exactly have Otto-level success just yet, but is good enough to end up on the wrong end of a Hooli lawsuit.

How're we doing, Big Head?

The lawsuit

Yes, it's not a perfect comparison, but what Pied Piper goes through with Hooli is similar to what's going on between Google and Uber.

The basic accusation is the same — that technology was taken by a person who then started a new company

In Silicon Valley, Hooli accuses Hendricks of taking the algorithm that he had developed while working at Hooli to start Pied Piper. Because he sometimes used Hooli resources (he used his work laptop to test one tiny portion of his algorithm), he nearly loses the lawsuit. (He ends up winning on a technicality concerning his employment contract.)

That's essentially the same thing Google is saying Levandowski did, but on a much, much bigger scale, in starting Otto. In particular, Google is saying that Levandowski took Google resources, including more than 14,000 files, some of which contained "highly confidential" information.

There are differences, for sure. In Silicon Valley, Hendricks is the sole, brilliant mind behind the algorithm that much of the show's run has centered on — forcing Hooli to try to develop the same technology on its own. In the real world, Levandowski was just one of a team of engineers working on Waymo.

Check out the arbitration scene below. If the lawsuit goes to court, there's a good chance Levandowski will be forced to answer questions in the same way.

Back to reality

As much fun as it is to find GIFs and clips of Silicon Valleyall day, there is also a recent real-life case that mirrors Google vs. Uber.

In February, a jury ordered Facebook to pay $500 million in a case that included accusations that the founders of Oculus Rift stole trade secrets. Facebook and Oculus ended up avoiding the worst of the allegations, which sounds a lot like what Google is saying Levandowski did.

In the Oculus case, a company called Zenimax claimed that former employees of Id Software had taken code from Id that would later be used in the development of the software portion of the Oculus Rift virtual reality system. Zenmiax acquired Id Software, leading the company to pursue charges against Oculus and its owner, Facebook.

There are key differences, but the takeaway is the same. Patents and trade secrets are closely guarded in the tech world. And with companies constantly buying other companies — in many cases for that particular technology — these kinds of cases are actually relatively common, which is probably why Silicon Valleychose to tackle the subject.

Such is the competition to make the world a better place.


Featured Video For You
Apple's new 'Apple Park' spaceship campus will open in April

0.1188s , 12214.7421875 kb

Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【monster girl pussy sex video】The Google v. Uber lawsuit is confusing, until you watch 'Silicon Valley',Public Opinion Flash  

Sitemap

Top 主站蜘蛛池模板: 无码写真精品永久福利在线 | 日韩精品无码免费网站 | 国产精品久久久久久久久夜色 | a级国产乱理论片在线播放 a级国产乱理论片在线观看 | 欧美日韩一区视频 | 麻豆星空传媒视频中国 | 丁香婷婷六月综合交清 | 无码不卡影视影院 | 99麻豆精品国产人妻无码 | 另类videosse| 少妇人妻系列无码专区按摩 | 国产无套码aⅴ在线观看在线播放 | 亚洲伦理一区二区三区 | 99久久精品免费看国产高清 | 亚洲欧美另类一区 | 字幕制服中文在线 | 人妻91 | 狠狠色综合色综合网络 | 日本中文字幕在线视频一区 | 国产精品不卡在线观看的a站 | 免费观看黄色的网站 | 欧美日韩一区二区三区久久 | 精品露脸国产偷人在视频7 精品乱码8久久久久久日本 | 91精品久久久久久久蜜臀 | 无码精品日本一区二区桃花岛 | 国产成人一区二区三区综合区 | 亚洲中文字幕无码乱线久久视 | 91麻豆极品在线观看 | 久久精品aⅴ无码中文字字幕不卡 | a真人一级毛片日韩区 | 国产成人精品久久不卡无码一区二区精品 | 国产av无码专区毛片 | 国产成人免费高潮激情视频 | 国产丝袜一区二区在线播放 | 无码久久精品蜜桃 | 韩国三级大全久久网站中文字幕 | 国产综合成人亚洲区 | 国产成年女一区二区三区 | 久久久久一区二区三区乱码 | 日韩精品无码一区二区三区 | 91人人揉日日捏人人看 |