Set as Homepage - Add to Favorites

日韩欧美成人一区二区三区免费-日韩欧美成人免费中文字幕-日韩欧美成人免费观看-日韩欧美成人免-日韩欧美不卡一区-日韩欧美爱情中文字幕在线

【gay free boy sex videos】Big Tech readies itself for two very distinct grillings at Senate hearing

Get ready for some Senate questioning whiplash.

On Wednesday morning,gay free boy sex videos the CEOs of Twitter, Facebook, and Google will once again log into a video chat service and make performative shows of supplicating themselves before our elected officials.

However, unlike July's antitrust hearing, this time Mark Zuckerberg, Jack Dorsey, and Sundar Pichai will have to answer for the presumed excesses permitted by Section 230 — but just what exactly those excesses may be will depend very much on whether it's a Republican or Democrat asking the questions.

The hearing, titled "Does Section 230's Sweeping Immunity Enable Big Tech Bad Behavior?," seems like, at first glance, a straightforward investigation into a provision of the Communications Decency Act of 1996. Of course, that assumes anyone can agree on what, precisely, the "bad behavior" in question really is. Therein lies the problem.

But first, a little refresher. Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act gives online platforms legal protection against being held liable for the things their users post (with some exceptions). Without Section 230, for example, Twitter might potentially be liable for the content of every tweet.

According to prominent conservative lawmakers like Senator Marco Rubio, Section 230 is a key plate in the legal armor allowing tech companies to maintain their so-called (and fictitious) "anti-conservative bias."

"The once nascent, scrappy internet companies that benefited from the protections afforded by Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act have become Goliaths intent on twisting and manipulating America's public square to their liking," wrote Rubio in an Oct. 15 press release.

Prominent Democratic figures, like current presidential candidate Joe Biden, on the other hand have taken the different (and likewise misinformed) position that Section 230 should be completely abolished in order to allow for the better regulation of tech platforms like Facebook.

Mashable Light Speed Want more out-of-this world tech, space and science stories? Sign up for Mashable's weekly Light Speed newsletter. By clicking Sign Me Up, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Thanks for signing up!

In a January interview with the New York Timeseditorial board, Biden expounded on his belief that Section 230 gives legal room for companies like Facebook to spread misinformation.

Mashable ImagePichai has his antitrust suit on. Credit: MANDEL NGAN / getty

"[The Times] can't write something you know to be false and be exempt from being sued," he told the interviewers. "But [Mark Zuckerberg] can.The idea that it's a tech company is that Section 230 should be revoked, immediately should be revoked, number one. For Zuckerberg and other platforms."

It is these two, radically different, complaints to which Dorsey, Zuckerberg, and Pichai will need to respond.

In reality, it's unlikely that reforming Section 230 would have a materially negative effect on established tech giants like Facebook or Google. Those companies have the legal teams and bank accounts to deal with the fallout a radical change to Section 230 would likely precipitate.

This is more than just idle speculation. In his opening remarks Wednesday morning, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg intends to advocate for a reform to Section 230.

"Section 230 made it possible for every major internet service to be built and ensured important values like free expression and openness were part of how platforms operate," reads a section of his prepared comments, published by USA Today. "Changing it is a significant decision. However, I believe Congress should update the law to make sure it's working as intended."

This statement likely came as no surprise to experts who've been tracking the growing chorus to repeal or reform Section 230.

Evan Greer, the deputy director of Fight for the Future — a self-described collection of artists, activists, technologists, and engineers advocating for digital rights — summed up the expected state of affairs following any Section 230 reform.

SEE ALSO: People are fighting algorithms for a more just and equitable future. You can, too.

"Facebook has an army of lawyers who will be able deal with the potential flurry of incoming lawsuits unleashed by poking holes in Section 230," she wrote. "The real victims will be individual Internet users, and more community oriented platforms like Wikipedia, Bandcamp, and Craigslist."

But because Section 230 is complex, and, likely to most voters, opaque, it serves as the perfect scapegoat ahead of the 2020 U.S. presidential election. At Wednesday's Senate hearing, expect Republicans and Democrats to beat that scapegoat with very different, but likewise nonsensical, sticks.

Topics Facebook

0.1512s , 14204.203125 kb

Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【gay free boy sex videos】Big Tech readies itself for two very distinct grillings at Senate hearing,Public Opinion Flash  

Sitemap

Top 主站蜘蛛池模板: 精品日产卡一卡二卡国色天香 | 亚洲精品高潮久久久久久日本 | 国产h视频在线观看 | 国产精品爆乳在线播放第一人称 | 国产中文字幕久久一区 | 麻豆av一区二区无码 | a级精品九九九大片免费看 a级伦国产乱理片在线观看 | 成年女人免费视频播放77777 | 国产精品寸止一区二区三区四区 | 欧美日韩国产区在线观看 | 亚洲精品国产福 | 成日本片免费aⅴ在线观看 成色A片202477在线小说 | 精品一区二区三区免费毛片 | 久久精品国产99久久久小说 | hd无码乱码无码亚洲精品无码不卡 | 99欧美日韩精品综合色 | 麻花豆传媒剧免费mV | 国产在线成人一区二区三区 | 日日夜夜免费精品视频d | 激情综合色综合啪啪五月丁香搜索 | 成人午夜亚洲精品无码忘忧草 | 欧美日韩国产另类久久 | 无码精品人妻一区二区三区免费看 | 欧洲精品高清无码一区二区三区 | 人与动动物xxxx毛片人与 | 日本午夜视频在 | 一边吃胸边膜下免费版刺激 | 国产国产人精品视频69 | 国产福利微拍精品一区二区 | 久久久国产久久国产久 | 亚洲男人天堂免费视频 | 国产黄网站 | 久久久亚洲东京热 | 无码aⅴ精品一区二区三区 无码aⅴ精品一区二区三区浪潮 | 久久无码爆乳一区二区三区 | 中文国产乱码在线人妻一区二区 | 91精品国产一区二区无码 | 欧美一级欧美一级在线播放 | 亚洲大片精品永久免费看网站 | 久久成人精品国产亚洲 | 亚洲综合久久成人A片红豆 亚洲综合久久久久久久久久网 |