Set as Homepage - Add to Favorites

日韩欧美成人一区二区三区免费-日韩欧美成人免费中文字幕-日韩欧美成人免费观看-日韩欧美成人免-日韩欧美不卡一区-日韩欧美爱情中文字幕在线

【mom best sex videos】Eat the Press
The mom best sex videosJaundiced Eyeball Chris Lehmann , June 8, 2017

Eat the Press

GOP strategists want the news media to be their chew toy “The press is under no obligation to be popular.” / Michael Mandiberg
Word Factory W
o
r
d

F
a
c
t
o
r
y

The great Republican press wars?seem poised to enter their high-baroque phase, to judge by recent reports on the GOP consultant class’s 2018 midterm strategy. With virtually no recent legislative achievements to tout—save, that is, for a hideously unpopular House-endorsed health care bill that has many incumbent Republican lawmakers playing hide-and-seek with their constituents—the likeliest strategy for motivating the party’s shrinking hardcore Trumpist base is to take a page from the Great Leader’s message playbook and lay wholeheartedly into the alleged perfidies of the fake-news class. Politics is the organization of hatreds, as Kevin Phillips the architect of the original Nixon backlash strategy said, and there appears to be no more reliable organizing template on offer than the ritualized assault on newshounds as faithless, decadent fops of elitist privilege. The basic math here is simple, as former right-wing talk-radio host Charlie Sykes laid it out for McClatchy correspondents Alex Roarty and Lindsay Wise: “Hillary Clinton is not on the ballot, so you have to have something else to run against. And the media is perfect.”?

It’s true: Not six months into the Trump age, the press continues to be the chew toy of first resort for the president and his apparatchiks. Early on, the White House’s rumpled pseudo-intellectual Rasputin Steve Bannon put the press on notice it would heretofore be considered “the opposition party” and helpfully sketched out its role in the new political order thusly:

The media should be embarrassed and humiliated and keep its mouth shut and just listen for awhile. . . . The mainstream media has not fired or terminated anyone associated with following our campaign. Look at the Twitter feeds of these people: They were outright activists of the Clinton campaign. . . .That’s why you have no power. You were humiliated.

As for Trump, well, all you have to do is alight on his Twitter feed on any given day for a new broadside against the purveyors of Fake News, and the corresponding heroic public virtues of his unfiltered social-media muse. It’s a baby-simple formula, beloved of many authoritarian regimes: You can’t trust the organs of information, but you can trust the Maximum Leader’s mystic feel for the popular mood.

It’s not as though Team Trump is?going to demonize?the lords of private capital, for God’s sake.

It’s not surprising that Team Trump, which came to power as a norm-defying cohort of plutocrats putatively looking out for the nation’s white working stiffs, should so obsessively lay into the media. It’s not as though they’re going to demonize the lords of private capital, for God’s sake. What is surprising, though, is how thoroughly the media itself continues to uncritically embrace the manipulative, self-interested Trumpian terms of engagement on the ever-unproveable question of rampant liberal press bias. Just consider the parting ruminations of Liz Spayd, the New York Timespublic editor who was mercifully sent packing in a burst of deafening irrelevance this past Sunday. Mustering her best Goldilocks-on-acid scolding voice, Spayd offered this daft counsel to the beleaguered pixel-stained press minions cast in the role of permanently humiliated, and preferably silenced, opposition by Bannon and company:?

Derision may feel more satisfying, but in the long run stories that are measured in tone are more powerful. Whether journalists realize it or not, with impartiality comes authority—and right now it’s in short supply.

Mike Morell, former acting director of the C.I.A., and a backer of Hillary Clinton, earlier this week likened the U.S. media’s reaction to Donald Trump to the Venezuelan media’s reaction when Hugo Chávez became president nearly 20 years ago. With little political opposition to Chávez, the media assumed that role, Morell said, and ultimately lost its credibility with the Venezuelan people.?

The U.S. isn’t Venezuela but the media here shouldn’t fall into the same trap . . . .[I]n their effort to hold Trump accountable, will [the Timesand the Washington Post] play their hands wisely and fairly? Or will they make reckless decisions and draw premature conclusions?

Leaving aside her reliance on a career CIA apparatchik as a credible arbiter of press responsibility, consider the underlying logic of Spayd’s prim little Venezuelan fable. The overexuberant embrace of an adversarial posture toward state power, she instructs us, produced a legitimation crisis for the Venezuelan press, one that cost it “credibility” with the Venezuelan populace. In this weird schematic account of press-state relations, the media are tacitly cast in the role of a representative body—one that defies the popular will at its evident moral peril.

But here’s the thing: a responsible press never has functioned, and never should function, that way. There’s a reason that “giving the people what they want” has long been a transparent alibi for masscult pandering and tabloid predation through the ages; it is a cowardly hack’s mantra. The problem, from any reasoned understanding of the press’s role in advancing democratic thought and discourse, is that to be in anything otherthan an adversarial relationship with state power is to be negligent. To worry that such a stance renders the press unpopular, or might risk—horrors!—“premature conclusions” and recklessness in the nation’s editorial conference rooms is a bit like saying Jared Kushner is a model self-made man. It’s a category error of massive proportions.

Indeed, it’s the fallacious image of the press as a proxy for the vox populi—or a rough cross-section of self-cancelling establishment opinion—that has so long permitted the bootless plaints of liberal bias to take such firm hold on the right. In the tediously whinging annals of right-wing press baiting, the basic refrain is always that the press is incorrigibly infested with antipopulist, elitist cultural attitudes, and therefore compulsively marginalizes, dismisses, and distorts the hardy, plain-folk values of the solidly Americanist right. (Just how it is that conglomeratized, access-besotted media industry has come by this diehard battery of subversive anticapitalist values is a conundrum for another day.)

It’s the fallacious image of the press as a proxy for the vox populi that permits Fox News to dine out on the Orwellian mission statement “fair and balanced.”

This is the core cognitive mindfuck that permits an arm of far-right propaganda like Fox News to dine out on the Orwellian mission statement “fair and balanced”—or for that matter, rationalizes the hiring of a conservative movement hack in your op-ed pages on grounds of ideological diversity. It’s also what’s permitted the whole ghastly armada of right-wing shake-down pundits, from Laura Ingraham to Matt Drudge to David Horowitz to still-revered sociopaths like Bill O’Reilly and Dinesh D’Souza to mint bona fide media-titan careers out of the laughable, threadbare fiction that they’re persecuted truth tellers in a relentlessly hostile culture of media elitism. Ditto, of course, for former Goldman-and-Hollywood operator Bannon and reality-TV exhibitionist Trump: They suck up most of the available media oxygen, and once they’ve secured their power base, they put themselves forward as martyrs of unhinged, truth-averse media bias.

The scam is by now so unobstructed by anything resembling basic fact-checking, let alone serious accountability of the sort rhetorically invoked by the Liz Spayds of the world, that the Trump administration has degenerated, in remarkably swift dispatch, into what is little more than a hollow media spectacle. As Ned Resnikoff notes in a bracing recent survey of the White House’s pseudo-event choreography, “President Trump is not embellishing his agenda with fictitious achievements. The pretend bill-signings and symbolic declarations arehis agenda.” And not surprisingly, this prefab simulacrum of governance is gradually getting exposed for the supremely cynical self-aggrandizing ploy that every other entry on the Donald Trump resume has proved to be:

Some of these non-policies can invigorate Trump’s base, or provide the temporary illusion of momentum. But few have translated into anything approaching a real legacy. And none of them have arrested the inexorable downward slide of the president’s approval rating?—?quite the opposite, in fact. Based on?the Gallup daily tracking numbers, it looks like taking away millions of people’s health coverage and ripping up multinational agreements to mitigate climate change are unpopular even in the abstract.

The secret of any good con is knowing when to take the money and beat a hasty departure. But Trump’s con landed him a four-year term in America’s highest office; his efforts to extend that grift for the duration have not, so far, been particularly successful.

If chronicling this great rolling shakedown known as the Trump presidency puts a big target on the media’s back for the 2018 midterms, or somehow taints the sacred aura of impartiality that we’re continuously—and erroneously—told is the holy grail of American newsgathering, well, then so be it. The press is under no obligation to be popular, any more than (as Isaiah Berlin put it) the truth is under any obligation to be interesting. It is, however, under an obligation not to treat its readers as children, paranoid alarmists, or rubes. And so when a group of powerful people, of any ideological provenance, sets about rendering the truth of its own actions as a media confabulation—especially one that professes to subdue and correct the media on terms that its creators dictate—the press is obliged to do the opposite of what Steve Bannon, Donald Trump, and Liz Spayd want, and to speak long and loudly about all the many official self-interested lies piling up in plain sight.

0.1893s , 14072.171875 kb

Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【mom best sex videos】Eat the Press,Public Opinion Flash  

Sitemap

Top 主站蜘蛛池模板: 呦男呦女精品视频十区 | 91精品福利在线观看 | 亚洲av高清在线一区二区三区 | 无码精品国产一区二区免费 | 国产私拍福利在线观看视频 | 精品高清国产一区二区三区四区 | 亚洲中文字幕无码一区 | 国产又黄又粗又爽又色的视频软件 | 免费国产成人高清在线观看视频 | 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线 | 亚洲欧美日韩中文字幕在线 | 丰满的少妇一区二区三区免费观看 | 岛国一级毛片 | 亚洲人妻色图av | 91制片厂制作果冻传媒网站 | 成年美女网站色在线看免费 | 成人无码区免费aⅴ片在线观看 | 国产aⅴ精品一区二区久久 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区 | 18禁美女裸身无遮挡免费网站 | 东京热制服丝袜无码专区 | 精品国产亚洲一区二区三区四区 | 亚洲 欧美 变态 卡通 自拍 | 成人AV久久一区二区三区 | 久久综合九色综合欧美 | 亚洲A片V一区二区三区有声 | 日韩精品无码久久久观看 | 国产欧美另类久久久精品图片 | 久久伊人久久 | 毛片成人永久免费视频 | 日夜干在线视频 | 疯狂少妇2做爰中文字幕 | 国产制服无码视频专区第一页 | 丝袜长腿aⅴ | 成人无码在线观看亚洲 | 国产亚洲一欧美一区二区三区 | 亚洲一码二码三码精华液 | 色欲精品国产AV久久久 | 美女高潮全身流白浆福利区 | 午夜神器免费观看黄 | 91精品国产现在观看 | 精品国产第一区二区三区 |