Set as Homepage - Add to Favorites

日韩欧美成人一区二区三区免费-日韩欧美成人免费中文字幕-日韩欧美成人免费观看-日韩欧美成人免-日韩欧美不卡一区-日韩欧美爱情中文字幕在线

【bedava yeni mobil porno indir】EPA's leader is open to reconsidering crucial climate assessment

Scott Pruitt,bedava yeni mobil porno indir the administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), signaled in testimony before the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee on Tuesday that he is open to revisiting a bedrock scientific analysis that paved the way for his agency to regulate planet-warming greenhouse gases. If he does so, it could take the EPA entirely out of the ballgame when it comes to limiting emissions of carbon dioxide, methane, and other global warming pollutants.

It would also set up an epic legal battle that could go on for years.

That Pruitt is willing to entertain the notion of revisiting what is known as an “endangerment finding” under the Clean Air Act tells you a lot about how Pruitt views his own agency. He has spent his first year as administrator as a kind of trojan administrator, bent on destroying the agency’s work from within. He has swiftly rolled back regulations on everything from pesticide use to methane emissions, all while downsizing the agency’s workforce to Reagan-era levels.

SEE ALSO: EPA administrator Scott Pruitt kept close tabs on scrubbing agency's climate websites, documents show

The 2009 endangerment finding holds that carbon dioxide and emissions of other greenhouse gases from mobile sources, such as cars and trucks, “threaten the public health and welfare of current and future generations.” It was based entirely on the peer reviewed scientific literature tying global warming to greenhouse gas emissions from human activities.

Here's why this is a big deal: If this analysis is overturned, it would get the EPA out of the business of regulating global warming altogether, which the agency has the authority to do based on a 2007 Supreme Court decision.

When he was first confirmed in February 2017, Pruitt said the endangerment finding, which took about 2 years for agency scientists to produce, was settled law.

Here is the transcript of an exchange Pruitt had with Massachusetts Democrat Ed Markey during his confirmation hearing on Jan. 18, 2017.

Mashable Light Speed Want more out-of-this world tech, space and science stories? Sign up for Mashable's weekly Light Speed newsletter. By clicking Sign Me Up, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Thanks for signing up!

Markey:Will you promise to keep on the books the scientific finding that carbon pollution poses a danger to the American public health and welfare?

Pruitt:Two things, Senator. First, with respect to Massachusetts v. EPA, the Supreme Court said to the EPA that they had to make a decision.

Markey:That’s right.

Pruitt:To determine whether CO2 posed a risk and, as you indicated, in 2009 they did so. That is the law of the land, those two cases. There is an obligation of the EPA Administrator to do his or her job in fulfilling Massachusetts v. EPA and that endangerment finding from 2009.

Markey:So you will keep that scientific finding on the books?

Pruitt:That the endangerment finding is there and needs to be enforced and respected. Senator Markey:You will not review that scientific finding? Pruitt:There is nothing that I know that would cause a review at this point.

On Tuesday, though, Pruitt sang a different tune. When asked by ranking member Tom Carper of Delaware whether he still favors leaving the endangerment finding alone.

"We have not made a decision or determination on that," Pruitt said, leaving the door wide open to reconsidering the finding.

Let's just be clear about this. If Trump's EPA reverses the endangerment finding, it would pull the rug out of any attempts to regulate carbon dioxide emissions using regulatory means. Only congressional action, or perhaps an extraordinary court ruling, could compel national policy making then.

In fact, one way Pruitt may be maneuvering to undermine the endangerment finding is by holding public debates on climate science, the so-called "red team, blue team" debates, that are widely assumed to be skewed toward industry interpretations of the science.

During Tuesday's hearing, Pruitt said the debates "are still under consideration" despite being denounced by scientific organizations and prominent climate scientists as a sham.

Under former president Barack Obama, the EPA built upon the endangerment finding and crafted far-reaching regulations aimed at reducing emissions from coal-fired power plants, which is known as the Clean Power Plan.

Pruitt's EPA is currently working to scrap that plan, in favor of a far more narrowly targeted program that has yet to be fully rolled out. But Pruitt has not decided how far to go in stripping away the EPA's program to regulate greenhouse gases.

Some conservative activists have urged him to go after the endangerment finding as a means to knee-cap the EPA's ability to address climate change, and Pruitt has variously been reported to be both open to that route and reluctant given the legal fight that would ensue.

From Tuesday's hearing, it sounds like he's still debating it.


Featured Video For You
2017 is about to be one of the hottest years of all time

0.1223s , 8112.015625 kb

Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【bedava yeni mobil porno indir】EPA's leader is open to reconsidering crucial climate assessment,Public Opinion Flash  

Sitemap

Top 主站蜘蛛池模板: 丁香婷婷色综合激情五月 | 美女内射毛片在线看免费人动物 | 日本艳星一区二区三区四区 | 国产不卡的一区二区三区四区 | 国产精品99一区二区三区 | 精品亚州毛片在线免费观看 | 麻豆免费网站 | 久久久国产精华特点免费 | 国产成人精品无码 | 孕妇久久夜色精品国产爽爽 | 加勒比无码免费专区中文 | 丁香五月久久婷婷久久 | 国产精品制服丝袜美腿控 | 狠狠色丁香久久综合婷婷 | 99成人在线观看 | 男人的天堂在线2022AV | gogo亚洲肉体艺术照片9090 | 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡2024 | 亚洲日韩欧美制服第一页 | 亚洲国产a国产片精品 | 亚洲日本va中文字幕在线不卡 | 亚洲欧美视频一级 | 狠狠撸亚洲视频 | 国产在线播放精品视频 | 久久国产精品亚洲精品 | 99久久久无码国产精品69 | av办公室丝 | 毛茸茸性毛茸茸大b | 成人做爰高潮A片免费视频 成人做爰免费看视频韩国 成人做爰片免费网站 | 2024国内精品久久久久久影院 | 爱v在线一区二区国产精品 爱爱帝国亚洲一区二区三区 | 91精品一区二区三区久久久久 | 欧美与黑人午夜性猛交久久久 | 999精品久久久中文字幕 | 亚洲欧美自拍视频 | 四虎成人精品无码永久在线 | 96无人区码一码二码三码 | 国产精品美女流白浆视频 | 中文亚洲AV片在线观看无码 | 日日摸夜夜欧美一区二区 | 无码不卡中文字幕一区二区三区 |