Set as Homepage - Add to Favorites

日韩欧美成人一区二区三区免费-日韩欧美成人免费中文字幕-日韩欧美成人免费观看-日韩欧美成人免-日韩欧美不卡一区-日韩欧美爱情中文字幕在线

【cerita lucah seks dengan lecturer】EPA's leader is open to reconsidering crucial climate assessment

Scott Pruitt,cerita lucah seks dengan lecturer the administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), signaled in testimony before the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee on Tuesday that he is open to revisiting a bedrock scientific analysis that paved the way for his agency to regulate planet-warming greenhouse gases. If he does so, it could take the EPA entirely out of the ballgame when it comes to limiting emissions of carbon dioxide, methane, and other global warming pollutants.

It would also set up an epic legal battle that could go on for years.

That Pruitt is willing to entertain the notion of revisiting what is known as an “endangerment finding” under the Clean Air Act tells you a lot about how Pruitt views his own agency. He has spent his first year as administrator as a kind of trojan administrator, bent on destroying the agency’s work from within. He has swiftly rolled back regulations on everything from pesticide use to methane emissions, all while downsizing the agency’s workforce to Reagan-era levels.

SEE ALSO: EPA administrator Scott Pruitt kept close tabs on scrubbing agency's climate websites, documents show

The 2009 endangerment finding holds that carbon dioxide and emissions of other greenhouse gases from mobile sources, such as cars and trucks, “threaten the public health and welfare of current and future generations.” It was based entirely on the peer reviewed scientific literature tying global warming to greenhouse gas emissions from human activities.

Here's why this is a big deal: If this analysis is overturned, it would get the EPA out of the business of regulating global warming altogether, which the agency has the authority to do based on a 2007 Supreme Court decision.

When he was first confirmed in February 2017, Pruitt said the endangerment finding, which took about 2 years for agency scientists to produce, was settled law.

Here is the transcript of an exchange Pruitt had with Massachusetts Democrat Ed Markey during his confirmation hearing on Jan. 18, 2017.

Mashable Light Speed Want more out-of-this world tech, space and science stories? Sign up for Mashable's weekly Light Speed newsletter. By clicking Sign Me Up, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Thanks for signing up!

Markey:Will you promise to keep on the books the scientific finding that carbon pollution poses a danger to the American public health and welfare?

Pruitt:Two things, Senator. First, with respect to Massachusetts v. EPA, the Supreme Court said to the EPA that they had to make a decision.

Markey:That’s right.

Pruitt:To determine whether CO2 posed a risk and, as you indicated, in 2009 they did so. That is the law of the land, those two cases. There is an obligation of the EPA Administrator to do his or her job in fulfilling Massachusetts v. EPA and that endangerment finding from 2009.

Markey:So you will keep that scientific finding on the books?

Pruitt:That the endangerment finding is there and needs to be enforced and respected. Senator Markey:You will not review that scientific finding? Pruitt:There is nothing that I know that would cause a review at this point.

On Tuesday, though, Pruitt sang a different tune. When asked by ranking member Tom Carper of Delaware whether he still favors leaving the endangerment finding alone.

"We have not made a decision or determination on that," Pruitt said, leaving the door wide open to reconsidering the finding.

Let's just be clear about this. If Trump's EPA reverses the endangerment finding, it would pull the rug out of any attempts to regulate carbon dioxide emissions using regulatory means. Only congressional action, or perhaps an extraordinary court ruling, could compel national policy making then.

In fact, one way Pruitt may be maneuvering to undermine the endangerment finding is by holding public debates on climate science, the so-called "red team, blue team" debates, that are widely assumed to be skewed toward industry interpretations of the science.

During Tuesday's hearing, Pruitt said the debates "are still under consideration" despite being denounced by scientific organizations and prominent climate scientists as a sham.

Under former president Barack Obama, the EPA built upon the endangerment finding and crafted far-reaching regulations aimed at reducing emissions from coal-fired power plants, which is known as the Clean Power Plan.

Pruitt's EPA is currently working to scrap that plan, in favor of a far more narrowly targeted program that has yet to be fully rolled out. But Pruitt has not decided how far to go in stripping away the EPA's program to regulate greenhouse gases.

Some conservative activists have urged him to go after the endangerment finding as a means to knee-cap the EPA's ability to address climate change, and Pruitt has variously been reported to be both open to that route and reluctant given the legal fight that would ensue.

From Tuesday's hearing, it sounds like he's still debating it.


Featured Video For You
2017 is about to be one of the hottest years of all time

0.1223s , 10023.0859375 kb

Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【cerita lucah seks dengan lecturer】EPA's leader is open to reconsidering crucial climate assessment,Public Opinion Flash  

Sitemap

Top 主站蜘蛛池模板: 欧美人成在线观看 | 99久久人妻精品免费二区天天二区男人下载 | 活大器粗NP高H一女多夫 | 精品一区二区成人免费视频 | 涩色aa| 久久精品久久精品 | 久久久国产精品播放 | 久久精品国产亚洲av四叶草 | 欧洲乱码卡1卡2在线 | 内射丰满高大五十五岁熟女 | 亚洲一区二区三区无码视频 | 国产成人精品女人久久久 | 欧美特级午夜一区二区三区 | 中文国产 | 亚洲精品**7777777 | 激情综合久久 | 青青草原综合久久 | 成人免费又大又爽A片视频 成人免费在线观看视频 | 爆乳无码专区丁香婷婷网五月 | a级亚洲片精品久久久久久久 | 成a人无码精品va片 成a人亚洲精v品无码 | 美女扒开让男人桶 | 91免费无码国产在线观看观 | 久久综合国产一区二区三区无 | 大香线蕉视频伊人99 | 国产成人a区在线观看视频 国产成人a人亚洲精品无码 | 亚洲国产日韩无在线播放 | а天堂中文最新一区二区三区 | 久久精品无码一区二区一不 | 欧美自拍在线综合图区 | 麻豆精品人妻一区二区三区 | 人妻换人妻aa视频麻豆 | 无码一级毛片一区二区视频孕妇 | 精品国产亚洲一区二区在线 | 久久九九少妇免费看A片 | 丁香综合缴情六月婷婷 | 久久久精品人妻一区二区三区同人 | 韩国三级在线高速影院 | 亚州四虎精品久久久 | 麻豆果冻传媒新 | 2024日本大片免a费观看视频 |