Set as Homepage - Add to Favorites

日韩欧美成人一区二区三区免费-日韩欧美成人免费中文字幕-日韩欧美成人免费观看-日韩欧美成人免-日韩欧美不卡一区-日韩欧美爱情中文字幕在线

【brother sex with sister videos】Climate change lawsuit against oil giants tossed out by federal judge

A federal judge just tossed out a lawsuit brought against the world's largest oil companies for selling fuels they knew would boost sea levels and brother sex with sister videosdisrupt the global climate.

This decision, on its surface, is a victory for big oil. But the fight against these huge companies and their roles in stoking climate change is far from over.

The suit thrown out on Monday -- which was filed by San Francisco and Oakland -- won't doom similar lawsuits by New York, Colorado and six others in California against big oil for the damages wrought by future floods, droughts, and wildfire.

SEE ALSO: After attempts at censorship, National Park Service finally releases climate change report

"The overall effect on those state cases is negligible," Ann Carlson, the director of the Emmett Institute on Climate Change and the Environment at the UCLA School of Law, said in an interview.

These ongoing lawsuits sit in state courts, and this week's federal decision by U.S. District Court Judge William Alsup -- who previously received an unprecedented climate change lesson from both oil companies and scientists in the courtroom -- has little bearing in these separate, and more favorable, legal systems.

It's also a potentially good sign for future cases that Alsup didn't throw out the case on any scientific grounds.

Alsup agrees with the scientific findings that fossil fuel burning has spiked global temperatures and accelerated sea level rise, but when he threw out the suit, he decided that a U.S. court alone cannot solve such a weighty, global problem.

Original image replaced with Mashable logoOriginal image has been replaced. Credit: Mashable

In a 16-page statement, Alsup details that 120 years of advancing climate science shows fossil fuel burning has unquestionably driven climate change by releasing substantial amounts of heat-trapping carbon dioxide into Earth's atmosphere. However, he notes that a court by itself can't decide past and future damages that are "breathtaking" in scope.

"In Alsup's view, because climate change is a global problem, it requires a global solution," Michael Burger, the executive director of Columbia University's Sabin Center for Climate Change Law, said in an interview.

"The issue is not over science," wrote Alsup, who cited that "glaciers around the world have been shrinking" and "ice sheets over Greenland and Antarctica have been melting."

"The issue is a legal one — whether these producers of fossil fuels should pay for anticipated harm that will eventually flow from a rise in sea level," said Alsup.

Alsup believes he can't possibly decide how to impose punishment for the past, current, and future actions of these companies -- in large part because energy production has also benefited humanity, providing billions of people with electricity and improved lives.

These questions, "of how to appropriately balance these worldwide negatives against the worldwide positives of the energy itself," need the help of congress, the president, and foreign nations, he argues.

Mashable Light Speed Want more out-of-this world tech, space and science stories? Sign up for Mashable's weekly Light Speed newsletter. By clicking Sign Me Up, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Thanks for signing up!

"It [Alsup's decision] implicates other countries," said Burger. "He's saying ultimately the case needs to be resolved by political branches."

Not all climate lawsuits are doomed

Alsup is a well-known federal judge whose opinion could very well influence other cases against oil companies like Shell and Chevron. But many similar lawsuits, like those in Colorado and New York, are subject to different, more well-established laws.

"His decision is irrelevant from a legal perspective," Carlson said, as long as these cases stay in state courts.

Federal courts, like Alsup's, are less favorable to lawsuits like San Francisco and Oakland's, which contend that fossils fuel companies are liable for damages because they've created a public "nuisance," said Carlson. (Nuisance is a realm of law that means an action that, broadly speaking, causes trouble or injury.)

On the national level, judges simply don't have much to work with. Congress hasn't even weighed in on what the law should be for cities suing fossil fuel companies, said Carlson.

"We're really in a new world in state court," Carlson added, noting that California nuisance laws are well-established, written statues with guidelines to follow.

Original image replaced with Mashable logoOriginal image has been replaced. Credit: Mashable

Accordingly, Alsup's earlier decision to allow this case to stay in federal court may have been a big problem to begin with.

"He’s just starting with a roadblock," said Carlson. "My view is he got the question wrong. It [this case] should stay in the states."

And these state cases appear to be safe for now, meaning they won't be tossed out because Alsup thinks they require a political, or even global, solution. State courts are separate entities from federal courts, and their unique nuisance laws might be effectively used in these lawsuits.

Still, though, there's more to come from Alsup's judgement.

The decision, said Burger, could soon be appealed to another federal court, where another judge will decide if such a case must indeed fall under the dominion of the federal government for an appropriate law to be made -- if any.

This sort of lawsuit -- suing fossil fuel companies for stoking climate change -- is relatively new, uncharted territory.

But one thing is certain: Climate change, said Alsup, is not in dispute. It's who has to pay, how much, and who's going to decide.

"It’s Alsup’s view that because sea level rise impacts all navigable water of the U.S., it falls under the jurisdiction of the United States," as opposed to a certain state, said Burger. "And because of the global nature of climate change, it requires as uniform a rule as can be developed."

It's less clear, however, if U.S. lawmakers will tackle the problem.

“By kicking the case to a do-nothing congress and a climate denying White House, the court essentially ruled that taxpayers alone should pay the massive costs of adapting to climate change," Richard Wiles, executive director of the Center for Climate Integrity, said in a statement.

"There are always adverse decisions along the road to victory," Wiles added. "That was true in tobacco, lead, and asbestos, where the courts ultimately crafted a solution to a major crisis. This fight is just getting started and we expect to win.”


Featured Video For You
Ever wonder how the universe might end?

0.1471s , 14176.9375 kb

Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【brother sex with sister videos】Climate change lawsuit against oil giants tossed out by federal judge,Public Opinion Flash  

Sitemap

Top 主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产精品日日摸夜夜添夜夜添1国产精品va欧美精品 | 变态另类国产精品制服丝袜 | 天堂AV无码AV毛片毛 | 中文字幕无码一二三 | 精品少妇爆乳av无码专区 | 中文文字幕文字幕亚洲色 | 成人起碰免费视频 | 国产精品亚洲日韩欧美色窝窝色 | 国产成人av在线影院 | 中文字幕人成乱在线视频 | 2024亚洲男人天堂 | 久久国产精品久久国产片 | 国产精品欧洲专区无码 | 国产精品亚洲精品日韩已满十八 | 香蕉人人网在线播放 | 成片免费视频 | 午夜DV内射一区区 | 国产成人无码va在线观看 | 国产一区二区内射最近更新 | 精品国精品国产自在久国产应用 | 91精品国产高清久久久久久 | 美女啪啪网站又黄又免费 | 久久国产精品99国产精 | 精品日本亚洲一区二区三区 | 日本久久久WWW成人免费毛片丨 | 久久综合久久 | 国产成人精品免费视频 | 亚洲精品中文字幕不卡在线 | 强壮的公次次弄得我高潮A片日本 | 亚洲av永久无码精品漫画 | 亚洲欧洲卡1卡2卡新区2022八 | 每日更新国产 | 亚洲伦理在线观看 | 国产系列视频二区 | 家庭教师 波多野结衣 | 久久99精品久久久久久噜噜丰满 | 无码欧美一区二区三区 | 成人综合国语对白 | 亚洲自拍主播无码视频 | 中文字幕极速在线观看 | 五月色综合无码一区二区三区 |