Set as Homepage - Add to Favorites

日韩欧美成人一区二区三区免费-日韩欧美成人免费中文字幕-日韩欧美成人免费观看-日韩欧美成人免-日韩欧美不卡一区-日韩欧美爱情中文字幕在线

【young incest sex video】Automated fact

The young incest sex videocoronavirus pandemic, protests overpolicekillings and systemic racism, and a contentious election have created the perfect storm for misinformationon social media.

But don't expect AI to save us.

Twitter’s recent decision to red-flag President Donald Trump's false claims about mail-in ballots has reinvigorated the debate on whether social media platforms should fact-check posts.


You May Also Like

The president suggested Twitter was "interfering" in the 2020 election by adding a label that encouraged readers to “get the facts about mail-in ballots."

In response, tech leaders explored the idea of using open-source, fully automated fact-checking technology to solve the problem.

Not everyone, however, was so enthusiastic.

“I’m sorry to sound boring and non–science fiction about this, but I feel like that is just a very difficult future for me to be able to see,” Andrew Dudfield, head of automated fact-checking at the UK-based independent nonprofit Full Fact, said. “It requires so much nuance and so much sophistication that I think the technology is not really able to do that at this stage.”

At Full Fact, a grant recipient of Google AI for social good, automation supplements — but doesn’t replace — the traditional fact-checking process.

Automation’s ability to synthesize large amounts of information has helped fact-checkers adapt to the breadth and depth of the online information environment, Dudfield said. But some tasks — like interpreting verified facts in context, or accounting for different caveats and linguistic subtleties — are currently better served with human oversight.

“We're using the power of some AI … with enough confidence that we can put that in front of a fact-checker and say, ‘This appears to be a match,’” Dudfield said. “I think taking that to the extreme of automating that work — that’s really pushing things at the moment.”

Mona Sloane, a sociologist who researches inequalities in AI design at New York University, also worries that fully automated fact-checking will help reinforce biases. She points to Black Twitter for example, where colloquial language is often disproportionately flagged as potentially offensive by AI.

To that end, both Sloane and Dudfield said it’s important to consider the nature of the data referenced by an algorithm.

“AI is codifying information that you give it, so if you give the system biased information, the output it generates will be biased,” Dudfield added. “But the inputs are coming from humans. So the problem in these things, ultimately, is making sure that you have the right data that goes in, and that you’re constantly checking these things.”

Mashable Light Speed Want more out-of-this world tech, space and science stories? Sign up for Mashable's weekly Light Speed newsletter. By clicking Sign Me Up, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Thanks for signing up!
"If you give the system biased information, the output it generates will be biased."

If those nuances go unaccounted for in fully automated systems, developers could create engineered inequalities that “explicitly work to amplify social hierarchies that are based in race, class, and gender,” Ruha Benjamin, African American studies professor at Princeton University, writes in her book Race after Technology. “Default discrimination grows out of design process that ignore social cleavages.”

But what happens when business gets in the way of the design process? What happens when social media platforms choose only to employ these technologies selectively to serve the interest of its clients?

Katy Culver, director of the Center for Journalism Ethics at the University of Wisconsin - Madison, said the economic incentives to boost users and engagement often inform how companies approach corporate social responsibility.

"If you had the top 100 spending advertisers in the world say, ‘We’re sick of myths and disinformation on your platform and we refuse to run our content alongside it,’ you can bet those platforms would do something about it," Culver said.

But the problem is that advertisers are often the ones spreading disinformation. Take Facebook, one of Full Fact’s partners, for example. Facebook’s policies exempt some of its biggest advertisers — politicians and political organizations — from fact-checking.

And Mark Zuckerberg’s favorite defense against critics? The ethics of the marketplace of ideas — the belief that the truth and the most widely accepted ideas will win out in a free competition of information.

But “power is not evenly distributed” in the marketplace, Culver said.

A Facebook internal finding saw “a larger infrastructure of accounts and publishers on the far right than on the far left," even though moreAmericans lean to the left than to the right.

And time and time again, Facebook has amplified content that's paid for — even when the information is deliberately misleading, or when it targets Black Americans.

“Ethics have been used as a smokescreen,” Sloane said. “Because ethics are not enforceable by law… They are not attuned to the wider political, social, and economic contexts. It's a deliberately vague term that sustains systems of power because what is ethical is defined by those in power.”

Facebook knows that its algorithm is polarizing users and amplifying bad actors. But it also knows that tackling these issues could sacrifice user engagement — and therefore ad revenue, which makes up 98 percent of the company's global revenue and totaled to almost $69.7 billion in just 2019 alone.

So it chose to do nothing.

Ultimately, combating disinformation and bias demands more than just performative concerns about sensationalism and defensive commitments to build “products that advance racial justice.” And it takes more than promises that AI will eventually fix everything.

It requires a genuine commitment to understanding and addressing how existing designs, products, and incentives perpetuate harmful misinformation — and the moral courage to do something about it in the face of political opposition.

“Products and services that offer fixes for social bias … may still end up reproducing, or even deepening, discriminatory processes because of the narrow ways in which ‘fairness’ is defined and operationalized,” Benjamin writes.

Whose interests are represented from the inception of the design process, and whose interests does it suppress? Who gets to sit at the table, and how transparently can social media companies communicate those processes?

Until social media companies commit to correcting existing biases, developing fully automated fact-checking technologies don't seem like the answer to the infodemic.

And so far, things are not looking so good.

Topics Artificial Intelligence Politics

0.1497s , 12226.625 kb

Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【young incest sex video】Automated fact,Public Opinion Flash  

Sitemap

Top 主站蜘蛛池模板: 日韩欧美视频一区二区三区 | 日本人与黑人 | 国产精品真人一级a爱做片高潮 | 久久无码人妻一区二区三区午夜 | 国产麻豆成人传媒免 | 精品免费看一区二区三区A片 | 久久久久亚洲av无码专区首jn | 国产a精品区二区三区四区 国产a精品一区二区 | 亚洲av无码天堂一区二区三区 | 福利一区二区精品秒拍 | 久久久久久精品久久久久 | 性欧美丰满熟妇xxxx性久久久 | 韩国三级伦理在线 | 99久久人妻无码精品系列蜜桃 | 91福利一区二区在线观看 | 国产欧美性爱亚洲性片 | 国产v最新精品自在自线 | 国产麻豆精品精 | 国产一区二区美女自卫 | 欧美亚洲日本在线观看 | 日本一道无马二区日本道专区 | 国产成年女人特黄特色毛片免 | 国产精品制服丝袜 | 99久久婷 | 国产欧美精品一区二区三区四区 | 成人天堂资源www在线 | 国产成人精品免费视频软件 | 免费看自慰喷水网站 | 无码精品一 | 北条麻妃人妻av无 | 国产伦精品一区二区三区免费 | 一区二区三区国产 | 日本黄色片网站 | 久久午夜无码影视 | 国产毛片一级不卡 | 国内精品久久无码人妻影院 | 国产精品欧美日韩中字一区二区 | 91精品少妇高潮一区二区三区不卡 | 亚洲午夜无码毛片AV久久京东热 | 久久国产乱子伦精品免 | 国产熟女一区视频在线播放 |