Set as Homepage - Add to Favorites

日韩欧美成人一区二区三区免费-日韩欧美成人免费中文字幕-日韩欧美成人免费观看-日韩欧美成人免-日韩欧美不卡一区-日韩欧美爱情中文字幕在线

【young incest sex video】Automated fact

The young incest sex videocoronavirus pandemic, protests overpolicekillings and systemic racism, and a contentious election have created the perfect storm for misinformationon social media.

But don't expect AI to save us.

Twitter’s recent decision to red-flag President Donald Trump's false claims about mail-in ballots has reinvigorated the debate on whether social media platforms should fact-check posts.


You May Also Like

The president suggested Twitter was "interfering" in the 2020 election by adding a label that encouraged readers to “get the facts about mail-in ballots."

In response, tech leaders explored the idea of using open-source, fully automated fact-checking technology to solve the problem.

Not everyone, however, was so enthusiastic.

“I’m sorry to sound boring and non–science fiction about this, but I feel like that is just a very difficult future for me to be able to see,” Andrew Dudfield, head of automated fact-checking at the UK-based independent nonprofit Full Fact, said. “It requires so much nuance and so much sophistication that I think the technology is not really able to do that at this stage.”

At Full Fact, a grant recipient of Google AI for social good, automation supplements — but doesn’t replace — the traditional fact-checking process.

Automation’s ability to synthesize large amounts of information has helped fact-checkers adapt to the breadth and depth of the online information environment, Dudfield said. But some tasks — like interpreting verified facts in context, or accounting for different caveats and linguistic subtleties — are currently better served with human oversight.

“We're using the power of some AI … with enough confidence that we can put that in front of a fact-checker and say, ‘This appears to be a match,’” Dudfield said. “I think taking that to the extreme of automating that work — that’s really pushing things at the moment.”

Mona Sloane, a sociologist who researches inequalities in AI design at New York University, also worries that fully automated fact-checking will help reinforce biases. She points to Black Twitter for example, where colloquial language is often disproportionately flagged as potentially offensive by AI.

To that end, both Sloane and Dudfield said it’s important to consider the nature of the data referenced by an algorithm.

“AI is codifying information that you give it, so if you give the system biased information, the output it generates will be biased,” Dudfield added. “But the inputs are coming from humans. So the problem in these things, ultimately, is making sure that you have the right data that goes in, and that you’re constantly checking these things.”

Mashable Light Speed Want more out-of-this world tech, space and science stories? Sign up for Mashable's weekly Light Speed newsletter. By clicking Sign Me Up, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Thanks for signing up!
"If you give the system biased information, the output it generates will be biased."

If those nuances go unaccounted for in fully automated systems, developers could create engineered inequalities that “explicitly work to amplify social hierarchies that are based in race, class, and gender,” Ruha Benjamin, African American studies professor at Princeton University, writes in her book Race after Technology. “Default discrimination grows out of design process that ignore social cleavages.”

But what happens when business gets in the way of the design process? What happens when social media platforms choose only to employ these technologies selectively to serve the interest of its clients?

Katy Culver, director of the Center for Journalism Ethics at the University of Wisconsin - Madison, said the economic incentives to boost users and engagement often inform how companies approach corporate social responsibility.

"If you had the top 100 spending advertisers in the world say, ‘We’re sick of myths and disinformation on your platform and we refuse to run our content alongside it,’ you can bet those platforms would do something about it," Culver said.

But the problem is that advertisers are often the ones spreading disinformation. Take Facebook, one of Full Fact’s partners, for example. Facebook’s policies exempt some of its biggest advertisers — politicians and political organizations — from fact-checking.

And Mark Zuckerberg’s favorite defense against critics? The ethics of the marketplace of ideas — the belief that the truth and the most widely accepted ideas will win out in a free competition of information.

But “power is not evenly distributed” in the marketplace, Culver said.

A Facebook internal finding saw “a larger infrastructure of accounts and publishers on the far right than on the far left," even though moreAmericans lean to the left than to the right.

And time and time again, Facebook has amplified content that's paid for — even when the information is deliberately misleading, or when it targets Black Americans.

“Ethics have been used as a smokescreen,” Sloane said. “Because ethics are not enforceable by law… They are not attuned to the wider political, social, and economic contexts. It's a deliberately vague term that sustains systems of power because what is ethical is defined by those in power.”

Facebook knows that its algorithm is polarizing users and amplifying bad actors. But it also knows that tackling these issues could sacrifice user engagement — and therefore ad revenue, which makes up 98 percent of the company's global revenue and totaled to almost $69.7 billion in just 2019 alone.

So it chose to do nothing.

Ultimately, combating disinformation and bias demands more than just performative concerns about sensationalism and defensive commitments to build “products that advance racial justice.” And it takes more than promises that AI will eventually fix everything.

It requires a genuine commitment to understanding and addressing how existing designs, products, and incentives perpetuate harmful misinformation — and the moral courage to do something about it in the face of political opposition.

“Products and services that offer fixes for social bias … may still end up reproducing, or even deepening, discriminatory processes because of the narrow ways in which ‘fairness’ is defined and operationalized,” Benjamin writes.

Whose interests are represented from the inception of the design process, and whose interests does it suppress? Who gets to sit at the table, and how transparently can social media companies communicate those processes?

Until social media companies commit to correcting existing biases, developing fully automated fact-checking technologies don't seem like the answer to the infodemic.

And so far, things are not looking so good.

Topics Artificial Intelligence Politics

0.1497s , 12226.625 kb

Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【young incest sex video】Automated fact,Public Opinion Flash  

Sitemap

Top 主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产日韩欧美高清片a | 中国鲜肉gay高中xx禁18网 | 国产乱子夫妻XX黑人XYX真爽 | 少妇特黄A片一区二区三区小说 | 特黄A又粗又大黄又爽A片 | 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线 | chinese国产av | 国产精品国产欧美综合一区 | 中文字幕日韩精品一区二区三区 | 四虎在线视频免费观看视频 | 亚洲精品无码成人A片在线虐 | 丁香花成人论坛 | 精品国产三级a在线欧 | 在线观看播放理论片 | 91超级碰久久久久香蕉人人 | 天天综合,91综合永久麻豆7799 | 72式性无遮挡免费视频 | 久久久久久精品国产免 | 国产2区 | 久久久噜噜噜久久久白丝袜 | 国产精品成人A片在线果冻 国产精品成人a区在线观看 | 国产女人十八毛片a级毛片 国产女人十八毛片水真多 国产女人水真多18毛片18精品 | 婷婷四月开心色房播播 | 精品久久久中文字幕二区 | 成人无码av一区二区三区 | 51精品国产综合久久久久久 | 国产精品麻豆免费版 | 老鸭窝亚洲图片欧美一区 | 久久人妻国产高清 | 国产一区二区三区高清在线观看 | 波多野结衣一区二区三区无码电影 | 亚洲欧美日韩精品高清 | 成日本片免费aⅴ在线观看 成色A片202477在线小说 | 精品亚洲成在人线av无码 | 粗大的内捧猛烈进出在线视频 | 北条麻妃一区二区三区精品 | 精品无码视频 | 99久久久久国产精品专区无码 | 国产亚洲欧美日韩综合综合二区 | 婷婷国产精品无码一区二区三区 | 亚洲日本在线观看视频 |