Set as Homepage - Add to Favorites

日韩欧美成人一区二区三区免费-日韩欧美成人免费中文字幕-日韩欧美成人免费观看-日韩欧美成人免-日韩欧美不卡一区-日韩欧美爱情中文字幕在线

【порнография детей】The maximalism design TikTok drama explained

I got you a gift! It's niche TikTok drama.

Two TikTok creators who create maximalist interior decorating videos have порнография детейgotten into a tiff that has created discussion online about who really ownsartistic ideas and what counts for plagiarism in a space that actively encourages DIYs and dupes.

First, you'll need to get to know our TikTok Main Characters. There's Tay BeepBoop, who does maximalist interior decorating for her nearly two million followers. There is also Kaarin Joy, who also does maximalist interior decorating for her nearly two million followers. Both creators have "DIY" in their bio which might lead you to believe that they want to show you how to do what they do at home so that you can do it yourself.


You May Also Like

Last week, Tay BeepBoop posted a video in which she says: "I'm about to be so petty." And, by god, the girl did not lie.

In the video, Tay BeepBoop called out Kaarin Joy out for copying her workmaking her case by showing images of her projects followed by images of Kaarin Joy's projects. Tay BeepBoop created a "mossy mirror," which is a massive, green mirror with moss crossing over the front and wrapping around it; Kaarin Joy made a mirror that had moss and flowers on the border. Tay BeepBoop painted a green squiggle on her wall and hung art on it; Kaarin Joy painted a green squiggle on her wall and hung art on it. In one comparison, Tay BeepBoop showed Kaarin Joy hanging up cake wallpaper that just happens to be from Tay BeepBoop's wallpaper line. This,Tay BeepBoop said in her video, is getting "out of hand."

There are rules among artists that you shouldn't copy what someone else did, word-for-word or color-for-color, and call it your own. For instance, if someone tweets a joke that does well, there are bound to be other people on Twitter who copy and paste the exact same tweet to get their own virality out of the joke. Most of the time, the repeat tweeter will be faced with dozens of tweet responses calling them out for copying. It's just not cool.

Mashable Trend Report Decode what’s viral, what’s next, and what it all means. Sign up for Mashable’s weekly Trend Report newsletter. By clicking Sign Me Up, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Thanks for signing up!

But these rules are stretched in the DIY world. Here, creators are showing their followers exactly how they are making something and are encouraging their followers to make that art, too. So, if someone is making DIYs on their page, it's assumed that they might not have created the entire DIY recipe on their own; some inspiration was taken, and that is, typically, allowed to an extent. Even when you're creating another person's DIY, crediting them is typically valued, but oftentimes a DIY is an amalgamation of many other DIYs — crediting every bit of inspiration isn't always doable.

Which is why, when Tay BeepBoop posted her video calling Kaarin Joy out, TikTok users did not agree with her. They commented that the two images of interior decor didn't look particularly similar and that the dates that the videos were posted wouldn't really coincide with Kaarin Joy copying Tay BeepBoop's work — there just wasn't enough time between the posted interior decorating videos. Creators don't generally film their work right before they post it, so when a video is posted doesn't necessarily coincide with when the project was completed.

Tay BeepBoop deleted the video later that day,and then posted this onto her stories: "I posted a vid today that I should have continued to handle privately. This isn't what I want my page to be about so I've removed it! I'm passionate about giving credit to designers and creators, and I wish that could have been the case here when it was first addressed."

By the time Tay BeepBoop deleted her video, Kaarin Joy had already made a response video of her saying that Tay BeepBoop is an inspiration to her, but that she didn't outright copy any of her work. In fact, Kaarin Joy said she had even bought some of Tay BeepBoop's wallpaper line and used it for her projects. Kaarin Joy called Tay BeepBoop's work "colorful" and "fun." She said that about two months ago, Tay BeepBoop had asked her not to do her DIYs, which Kaarin Joy said she "totally understood." She stopped posting videos of Tay BeepBoop's DIYs after the request — but their work was still similar because, well, the work they create in general is pretty similar.


Related Stories
  • Why does BookTok care about the NHL?
  • TikTok users in Europe will be able to opt out of personalized feeds
  • TikTok's 'when you know the words to the song, sing along' trend, explained
  • LGBTQ youth of color feel safest on their TikTok FYP, report finds
  • TikTok launches text posts amidst Twitter 'X' rebrand

Tay BeepBoop started posting her regular content in the days following the disagreement, but commenters were not having it. And then, Tay BeepBoop's ex-friends started coming out of the woodwork, claiming that she gets inspiration for the DIYs she shares with her audience from places like Pinterest and her friends and her boyfriend. Then, a new consequence: the company that produces and sells Tay BeepBoop's wallpaper stopped selling her work.

Tay BeepBoop then released an apology video, and all of her previous videos calling Kaarin Joy out appear to have been deleted.

It looks like the drama between Tay BeepBoop and Kaarin Joy has come to an end, but it has sparked dialogue online about what forum a conversation is meant for. One TikTok creator said they think this is exactly what group chats were created to do. Tay BeepBoop could have messaged her friends to say she thought Kaarin Joy was copying her instead of putting it online. 

The drama, and the ensuing debate about what it means to plagiarize in the DIY home decor world left behind a series of unresolved questions as TikTok's attention moved in to seek out another niche drama to consume. If you show two million people how to make something, and other people make it, is that considered a terrible deed? Or does the deed only become dangerous when the copier makes financial gains off of it? How different do you have to make an object for it to not be considered a cheap replica? And where does the line between inspiration and intellectual theft lie?

0.1192s , 7876.421875 kb

Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【порнография детей】The maximalism design TikTok drama explained,Public Opinion Flash  

Sitemap

Top 主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产乱子伦视频在线观看 | 久久涩涩| 精品欧美一区二区在线观看欧美熟 | 三妻四妾免费观看 | 麻豆国产av尤物网站尤物 | 一本道本月无码 | 日本视频高清一道一区 | 成人区人妻精品黑人av | 亚洲高清无码加勒比 | 少妇人妻无码专区视频 | 久久精品国产亚洲一区二区三区 | 国产一卡2卡3卡4卡有限公司 | 日日俺综合精品天天 | 亚洲综合色婷婷在线观看 | 丁香五月综合九 | 亚洲一区日韩一区欧美一区a | 日本阿v视频高清在线中文 日本阿v无码观看dvd | 91亚洲国产在人线播放午夜 | 蜜桃无码av一区二区 | 亚洲欧洲一区二区欧美国产 | 国产精品有码av | 精品无人区码一码二码三码区别 | 无码人妻精品一区二区三区性色 | 亚洲av永久纯肉无码精品动漫 | 中文欧美久久水蜜桃无码av一区二区 | 国产强奷在线播放免费 | 巨爆乳中文字幕巨爆区巨爆乳无码 | 夜夜嗨色综合av麻豆精品 | 波多野结衣中文字幕一区二区三 | 色综合久久88色综合天天 | 少妇精品久久久一区二区三区 | 黄色官网 | av麻豆出品免费在线观看 | 精品国产一区二区av片 | 亚洲欧美日韩精品久久无广告 | 精品日韩一区二区三区视频 | 国产成人无码免费看片色哟哟 | 亚洲一区二区三区av在线观看 | 一本道综合婷婷五国内精品综合 | 国产真实偷综合在线视频 | 国产真实强奷网站在线播放 |