Set as Homepage - Add to Favorites

日韩欧美成人一区二区三区免费-日韩欧美成人免费中文字幕-日韩欧美成人免费观看-日韩欧美成人免-日韩欧美不卡一区-日韩欧美爱情中文字幕在线

【sex video sister hub】Women’s Equality—When?
Alienated Rafia Zakaria ,sex video sister hub March 10, 2023

Women’s Equality—When?

Current prediction: gender parity in 132 years A women sits against a wall while reading a book.Tom Waterhouse
Columns C
o
l
u
m
n
s

This week brought another International Women’s Day, an event that is traced back to socialist rallies in 1908 and 1909 in Chicago and New York to support political and economic equality for women. Among the rituals that caught my eye this year were those (like last year and the year before that) calling for equal pay for women. As the speeches droned on, I could not help but wonder whether demanding gender parity by lobbying institutions and private enterprise is ever likely to produce actual pay parity.

Let me explain by providing an example from the latest World Economic Forum (WEF) “Global Gender Gap Report.” The WEF—looking at disparities in economic opportunity, education, health, and political empowerment—calculates that it will take another 132 years to close the global gender gap. The alarming figure created some commotion because it reflected lost ground: before the Covid-19 pandemic, the pre-2020 trends suggested it would only take about one hundred years to close the gap.

After doling out this dismal statistic in their report, one would have expected that the WEF would have made this statistic front and center at their annual conference at Davos in January 2023. This was not so. As the rich and powerful huddled over their gourmet repast, there were more than a hundred panels over five days—devoted to such topics as monetary policy, the metaverse, artificial intelligence, and “Finding the Right Balance for Crypto.” There was only one event, “Women’s Leadership,” devoted to women’s political power, with a couple others related to women’s economic prospects.

Ignored by the agenda-makers at the Davos meeting—almost two-thirds of whom happen to be men—UN Women tried to compensate by setting up a Gender Equality Hub on the sidelines of the conference. The idea was to urge the powerful and wealthy to use the “gender lens” in their other discussions at the conference. I mention this event in particular not because the WEF is to be blamed or because Davos is representative of the world at large (because it’s not). I mention this event because the contrast between reporting a staggering gender gap and then devoting so few public resources to discussions of gender reflects a wider misconception: the belief that to get to gender parity, women need to make nice with powerful men.

In the aftermath of this International Women’s Day, it’s time for women to put aside asking men to help and turn instead to demanding action. 

Nothing could be further from the truth. In the follow-up to this International Women’s Day, it’s time for women to put aside asking men to help and turn instead to demanding action. In 2023, when gender equality has been demoted to a near-impossibility, the idea that the route to gender equality lies in raising awareness and persuading men to do the bare minimum must be discarded. There are (or at least should be) no men alive, least of all among the powerful at Davos, who are not aware of inequality. The question is: What will they do?

If gender parity is to be maintained as a goal beyond a talking point on International Women’s Day and other similar occasions, then feminist organizations and other women’s organizations must brainstorm about how theycreateconsequences not only for the men who discriminate against women but also those men who pay lip service or shrug and look the other way. Collusion, silent or otherwise, in inequity requires moral accountability. So it must be with the resistant men who deny women their due and the men who talk the talk only because it is so very easy not to have to walk the walk.

Another change-from-below tactic that would work well against global corporations is to target their consumers. These tactics have already been deployed using the social media space when companies are shamed because they continue to purchase advertising or otherwise support racist and sexist public figures. If it has worked in those cases, it makes sense to see how it can be deployed against products produced by companies that are not visibly and substantively committed to ensuring that women are treated and paid the same as their male counterparts.

Taking aim at the world’s worst corporate offenders in terms of gender parity will also make the issue more prominent on the agenda of various political parties. This will encourage political parties, and ultimately governments, to present policies that can help achieve it. The promotion of programs that provide child care assistance is one way. Another is the promotion of legislation that fines companies for how far their numbers veer from the goal of gender parity. Corporate hearts are located in corporate coffers and the road to gender parity passes through the bottom line, not through the sidelines of Davos.

We have already seen the success of these sorts of public shaming during the #MeToo movement, when television networks and film companies had to cut ties with men who had assaulted and harassed women with impunity. Women had to turn to the court of public opinion at that time because the men in question had inveigled themselves so deeply into the power machinery that removing them by following procedures was not a realistic option.

The 132 years to gender parity is also a statistical nowhere. It marks gender parity not as an urgent goal but rather as something that would be nice to have in the distant future—and thus very low priority. In this forgotten position, gender parity is unlikely to be reached even in 1,320 years. International Women’s Day—a convenient and singular moment for a head nod to women—will likely be celebrated all the while just as it is now.

Some may think it is too strident and radical for women to take such a confrontational approach toward achieving the goal of parity in pay, health, education, and political power. Naming, shaming, and deploying the politics of protest could make people uncomfortable. But continuing to keep gender parity on the agenda without a more radical pursuit of progress suggests that even some women themselves do not believe that it is a realistic and achievable goal. If women are unable to stand up for equality now, it’s unlikely that those born in the next one hundred years will have any chance at inhabiting a just world.

0.1227s , 14106.765625 kb

Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【sex video sister hub】Women’s Equality—When?,Public Opinion Flash  

Sitemap

Top 主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产成人91激情在线播放 | 国产av日韩一区二区三区精品 | 中文字幕av人妻一本二本 | 成年美女毛片黄网站色奶头大全 | 国产精品国产三级国产普通话 | 免费久久精品 | 国产做A爰片毛片A片美国 | 91免费精品国自产拍偷拍 | 国产免费最黄视频 | 精品国产aⅴ一区二区三区v免费 | 日韩免费在线 | 欧美阿v天堂视频在99线 | 久久精品99久久香蕉国产 | 在线观看日韩一区 | 中文字幕乱码人在线视频1区 | 免费一级毛片视频 | 欧美激情视频二区三区 | 不卡免费观看高清国产黄片 | 中文字幕乱码人妻无码久久 | 成年黄网站18禁免费 | 日本aaaaa级无码av毛片 | 久久伊人精品一区二区三区 | 少妇我被躁爽到高潮A片 | 一区二区三区免费在线观看 | 欧美国产区一区二区三在线观看 | 国产成人精品成熟一区 | 亚洲AV综合AV国产AV中山 | 国产福利区一区二在线观看 | 国产精品无码一区二区在线观一 | 国产精品免费无遮挡无码 | 又黄又爽内射视频巨乳 | 精品国产尤物一区二区三区 | 精品一区二区日本高清 | 加勒比东京热国产精品 | 成人性生交A片免费看导航大全 | 精品无码久久久久久久久成人 | 国产人成一区二区三区影院 | 二区欧美三 | 精品国产乱码aaa一区二区 | 天堂8在线天堂资源在线 | 久久久久高潮无码精品 |