Set as Homepage - Add to Favorites

日韩欧美成人一区二区三区免费-日韩欧美成人免费中文字幕-日韩欧美成人免费观看-日韩欧美成人免-日韩欧美不卡一区-日韩欧美爱情中文字幕在线

【???? ?????? ??????】IACHR Rules in Favor of Japanese Peruvians Kidnapped During WWII
Isamu Carlos “Art” Shibayama testified on March 21, 2017 before the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights in Washington, D.C. about being forcibly removed from Peru with his family during World War II and being incarcerated in a Department of Justice camp in Texas. (Photo by MARTHA NAKAGAWA)

By MARTHA NAKAGAWA, Rafu Contributor

The Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) of the Organization of American States (OAS) came out with a verdict on Aug. 4 that ruled in favor of Isamu Carlos “Art” Shibayama and the Japanese Peruvian Oral History Project (JPOHP).

The IACHR is an independent agency within the OAS, and its main mission is to promote the observance and protection of human rights in the American hemisphere.

Because the IACHR has a huge backlog of cases, the ruling came 17 years after the Shibayama brothers — Art, Kenichi and Takeshi — and JPOHP filed a petition with the IACHR on June 10, 2003, and three years after Art Shibayama and Grace Shimizu with JPOHP testified before the IACHR in Washington D.C. Art Shibayama has since passed away and his brothers are in frail health.

Bekki Shibayama, daughter of Art, who testified along with her father in 2017, considered the ruling “bittersweet since the decision was not made during my father’s lifetime.”

The IACHR decision recommended reparations for human rights violations and full disclosure of the U.S. government’s actions and of the fates of the kidnapped Japanese Latin Americans.

Natsu Saito, law professor at Georgia State University in Atlanta, described the IACHR ruling as “extraordinary” since “it’s very difficult to get a case heard by the Inter-American Commission because as you can imagine there are a lot of human rights violations in the Americas.”

However, Saito noted that the IACHR could not address many of Shibayama’s claims since it only had jurisdiction over violations committed after 1951, when the U.S. joined the Charter of the OAS.

“The commission could only directly address the exclusion of the Japanese Latin Americans from the redress provided to Japanese Americans under the Civil Liberties Act of 1988,” said Saito.

BACKGROUND

During World War II, the Shibayama family were among the 2,264 Japanese Latin Americans forcibly taken away from their homes from more than 13 Latin American countries to be used in a hostage exchange between the U.S. and Japan.

More than 800 Japanese Latin Americans were victims of this hostage exchange, including Art Shibayama’s grandparents, whom the family never saw again after the war. Decades later, the family learned that the grandparents had lived in poverty in Japan.

The U.S. government came up with this wartime scheme after realizing it would not be feasible to exchange an American citizen of Japanese descent imprisoned in a U.S.-style concentration camp with a non-Japanese American prisoner of war held by Japan.

As a result, the U.S. government collaborated to round up Japanese living in the various Latin American countries and forcibly placed them on U.S. military ships, confiscated their passports and imprisoned them indefinitely for close to six years. When the war ended, the U.S. government categorized them as “illegal aliens” and deported more than 900 JLAs to war-torn Japan.

In addition, many of the Latin American countries refused re-entry of the JLAs after the war, making them stateless.

To add insult to injury, the JLAs were excluded from the Civil Liberties Act of 1988, which offered a governmental apology and token monetary reparation to Americans of Japanese descent imprisoned in U.S.-style concentration camps during World War II.

In an attempt to get equitable redress, the Shibayamas brought their case before the IACHR, an international forum, after five lawsuits and two unsuccessful congressional bills, according to Karen Parker, lead attorney for the Shibayamas and the JLAs.

The Shibayamas were among the 17 former incarcerees who opted out of the federal class-action lawsuit ruling in Mochizuki vs. the United States, in which $5,000 — one-fourth of what was given to former Japanese American incarcerees — was offered to former kidnapped JLAs. Art Shibayama considered this an insult and continued to pursue equitable redress for JLAs.

Born in Lima, Peru in 1930, Shibayama was 13 years old when he, along with his family, was kidnapped and transported to the U.S. aboard the USAT Cuba in 1944.

NEXT STEP

Shimizu said that with the IACHR decision, they plan to:

? Attempt to secure a meeting with the president of the United States after the November election to discuss compliance with the IACHR ruling;

? Work with Congress to develop legislation to comply with the IACHR decision;

? Educate the general public;

? Build solidarity with different communities with shared experiences of being forcibly uprooted, separated from families and indefinitely imprisoned.

Whether the U.S. government will consider the IACHR ruling remains to be seen since the IACHR does not have an enforcement component, and at the March 2017 hearing, the U.S. representative to the IACHR did not appear at the session. A spokesperson for the State Department said they were absent from the March hearings because the IACHR had not requested their presence.

However, Shimizu noted that the IACHR was a “bonafide international human rights organization whose decisions do carry the weight of interpreting international law and principles and treaties” but admitted that “governments do not always respect these international bodies and their decisions.”

“So then, we need to figure out and work towards holding our government accountable,” said Shimizu. “And that’s just not the Japanese Latin Americans’ job to do. It’s for everyone in the United States to hold this government accountable.”

For more than 70 years, the U.S. government has been able to avoid fully disclosing the extent of its international human rights violations during the war when it instigated the kidnapping of not only Japanese but also Germans, Italians and Jews from 13 complicit Latin American countries to be used in hostage exchanges with Japan, Germany and Italy.

Within the U.S., however, the majority of Japanese Americans have failed to embrace the plight of the JLAs, and sources, dead and alive, have independently confirmed that some Japanese American leaders, during the push for redress in the 1980s, made back-room dealings to exclude JLAs from any congressional redress legislation if that would ensure the passage of a redress bill for Japanese Americans.

As a result, the Civil Liberties Act of 1988 denies redress to “illegal aliens,” which is how the U.S. government categorized JLAs after the end of the war.

Additionally, the back-room dealings allegedly included an agreement not to be involved in pursuing future redress for JLAs.

While a small group of Japanese Americans did continue to pursue equitable redress for JLAs, support for JLAs on a wider basis has thus far failed to gain traction.

Rev. Michael Yoshii urged the community to come out and support their cause. “In the case of the Japanese Latin Americans, although it is a call for redress for past years of human rights violations, their stories evoke for us today lessons and inspiration for the fight against injustice taking place around the world,” he said.

Kazumu Julio Cesar Naganuma, who had been forcibly taken from Callao, Peru, along with his family to the Crystal City Department of Justice camp in Texas during the war, noted that his father had lost everything as a result of the U.S. government’s actions.

“Every single Japanese Latin American that was imprisoned, kidnapped, that was put into camp without due process, without representation, who were never charged with a crime and who were ultimately classified as illegal aliens — every single Japanese Latin American deserves reparations,” said Naganuma.

Phil Tajitsu Nash, who had submitted a letter of support to the IACHR on behalf of the Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund in 2017, encouraged those who want to support the JLAs to visit the website www.jlacampaignforjustice.org.

(Note: The original version of this story mistakenly stated that all three Shibayama brothers are deceased. Art Shibayama passed away on July 31, 2018.)

0.1187s , 9966.265625 kb

Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【???? ?????? ??????】IACHR Rules in Favor of Japanese Peruvians Kidnapped During WWII,Public Opinion Flash  

Sitemap

Top 主站蜘蛛池模板: 中文字幕一区二区三区在线不卡 | 亚洲一区三区激情啪啪欧美 | 久久综合网天天 | 亚洲欧美日韩中字视频三区 | 成a人片免费在线观看 | 国产成人18黄网站免费 | 99热精品免费观看全部 | 97人妻在线视频免费 | 精品久久久久久中文字幕女 | 久久亚洲综合中文字幕不卡 | 苍井空一区二区三区爱 | 国产成人精品午夜二三区 | 久久综合丝袜日本网首页 | 一边吃奶一边添P好爽故事 一边吃奶一边做边爱hd在线视频播放 | 久久人人澡人人爽人人爱 | 亚洲国产一区二区在线观看 | 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区 | 精品人妻久久一区二区三区 | 国产精品人妻无码 | 欧美激情中文字幕视频一二三四区免费 | 91精品福利久久久 | 精品少妇人妻av无码专区不卡 | 91精品午夜小视频在线观看性色 | 久久久免费看少妇高潮A片18禁 | 久久久精品成人免费观看 | 国产成人久久精品流白浆动态 | 无码精品视频一区二区三区 | 国产精品宾馆在线 | 精品国产三级a∨在线欧美 精品国产三级aⅴ在线 | 人妻系列中文字幕亚洲 | 久久久亚洲一区二区三区 | japanese护士高潮| 制服中文丝袜中文女脚 | 91精品国产麻豆91久久久久久 | 中文字幕av一区二区三区人妻少妇 | 成人日韩熟女高清视频一区 | 亚洲另类无码专区首页 | 18国产丰满xxx毛片成人内射国产免 | 日本三级带日本三级带黄国产 | 久久久国产精品无码免费专区 | 无码区国产区在线播放 |