Set as Homepage - Add to Favorites

日韩欧美成人一区二区三区免费-日韩欧美成人免费中文字幕-日韩欧美成人免费观看-日韩欧美成人免-日韩欧美不卡一区-日韩欧美爱情中文字幕在线

【sex sara jay huge ass videos】I’m Sticking with My President
Rick Perlstein ,sex sara jay huge ass videos May 10, 2017

I’m Sticking with My President

What has changed since Nixon’s day? Ousting Comey. / Jason Arias
Word Factory W
o
r
d

F
a
c
t
o
r
y

The president fired the official investigating the president: that’s the long and the short of it, whether we’re talking about Richard Nixon and independent prosecutor Archibald Cox in October of 1973, or Donald Trump and James Comey in May of 2017. Of the former travesty, the estimable historian Kevin Kruse explained what you need to know in these pages this past January, the last time Trump tempted constitutional crisis by firing acting attorney general Sally Yates. “It was 1,734 days into his presidency before Nixon had his famous showdown with the Justice Department. Trump, ever a model of efficiency, has reached a similar point in ten,” Kruse concluded.

That’s one difference. Here’s another—the most ominous difference of all. Then, Washington had a functioning civic culture, in which a critical mass of members of both parties proved willing to honor their oaths of office to uphold the Constitution. Now, however, we do not.

Nixon was on his third attorney general by the time of the “Saturday Night Massacre” in October 1973. John Mitchell had quit in March 1972 to manage Nixon’s reelection campaign. He had also served as Nixon’s 1968 campaign manager, making a mockery of any pretension of political independence in the Justice Department—though to be fair, John F. Kennedy had ruined said pretension first by naming his brother as AG. (Nevertheless, the Nixon White House is rarely outdone in these matters: Mitchell didn’t even wait to leave the federal payroll before getting to work, hosting a criminally conspiratorial meeting about how to sabotage the Democratic Party in the attorney general’s office in January 1972.) Mitchell’s replacement, Richard Kleindienst, resigned on April 30, 1973, under a cloud of pending scandal, for allegedly helping the conglomerate ITT bribe his boss. This banquet of Republican malfeasance was tempered, however, by Republican honor. Kleindienst’s replacement, Elliot Richardson, had only won confirmation by promising to the Senate Judiciary Committee not to interfere with any investigation of Watergate. When Richard Nixon ordered him to fire Cox, his inability to honor his pledge to the Senate triggered his resignation. Republicans used to be honorable like that. They even, unlike the supposedly upright deputy attorney general Rod Rosenstein, sometimes quit rather than carrying out Corleone-like orders.

Yes, there used to be Republicans like that: Republicans who sought to reward other Republicans for taking down a dishonorable Republican president.

So were conservative Democrats. Senator Sam Ervin, who presided over the Senate select committee to investigate Watergate aggressively and indefatigably, was a conservative with a record of voting with the president more than any other Democrat. On that panel were also two strikingly prosecutorial Republicans. Lowell Weicker, in his opening statement, called Watergate “the acts of men who almost stole America.” He was so determined to get to the truth, political consequences be damned, that he hired his own independent investigative staff. Howard Baker, who owed his political career to Nixon, initially leaked privileged committee details to the White House—but then buckled down and got so tough that Republicans started talking about him as a presidential prospect. Yes, there used to be Republicans like that, too: Republicans who sought to reward other Republicans for taking down a dishonorable Republican president. Consider, too, Republicans like Robert Packwood of Oregon. After the Saturday Night Massacre, his response was that “the office of the president does not carry with it a license to destroy justice in America.”

Now, however, Republicans appear to disagree. They believe the office of the president carries with it a license to issue talking points they eagerly repeat.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell: “Our Democratic colleagues [are] complaining about the removal of an FBI director whom they themselves repeatedly and sharply criticized. That removal [is] being done by a man, Rod Rosenstein, who they repeatedly and effusively praised.” Senator David Perdue of Georgia: “President Trump acted decisively and within his authority, and I stand behind him.” Chuck Grassley of Iowa noted “concern from across the political spectrum and from career law enforcement experts,” Lindsey Graham of South Carolina gamely suggested that “a fresh start will serve the FBI and the nation well.” This was indeed the White House’s own favorite propaganda line, most shamefully embellished by the supposed old-school moderate, Susan Collins of Maine, who said the firing was “l(fā)ikely the inevitable conclusion of Director Comey’s decision last July to bypass the longstanding protocols of the Justice Department and publicly announce the reasons he had decided not to recommend an indictment of Hillary Clinton and to offer his personal views of Mrs. Clinton’s actions.”

Collins, who is supposed to be smart, thus apes the most transparently stupid of the White House claims. For if Comey had behaved monstrously six months before Trump’s inauguration, why did Trump he wait until four months after his inauguration to fire him?

Nixon’s diehard defenders in the party were looked upon as clowns.

To even bother to ask the question is to insult the intelligence of anyone not craven enough to think like a Republican lawmaker, circa 2017.

The cult of “bipartisanship” in Washington—Tip and Dutch tippling whiskey when the workday is through, and all that—is usually ridiculous. But it was not conjured out of thin air. What I learned, studying Watergate, is that it was once something real, and precious. Nixon’s diehard defenders in the party were looked upon as clowns. Rep. Earl Landgrebe of Indiana went on the Today show on August 8, 1974, and said, “I’m sticking with my president even if he and I have to be carried out of this building and shot.” Incredulous, the NBC interviewer asked him about the just-revealed smoking gun tape, which demonstrated that Nixon had been lying about his participation in the coverup for almost twenty-six months: this was a fact. “Don’t confuse me with the facts,” Landgrebe infamously retorted. Hours later, Nixon resigned; and those words became the only thing for which anyone remembers Langrebe.

Nowadays, they would fit him for a position in the Republican leadership.

0.1274s , 14219.984375 kb

Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【sex sara jay huge ass videos】I’m Sticking with My President,Public Opinion Flash  

Sitemap

Top 主站蜘蛛池模板: jk国产精品福利在线观看 | 国产精品亚洲日韩欧美 | 国产久久久国产精品免费看 | 久久久久成人无码网站 | 国产乱子伦视频一区二区三区 | 亚洲AV久久久精品麻豆 | 麻豆av无码人妻一区二区三区 | 亚洲精品沙发午睡系列 | 色妺妺在线视频喷水 | 亚洲人妻精品综合无码专区 | 亚洲欧美自拍另类欧美 | a级毛片免费不卡在线播放 a级毛片免费高清 | 九九九涩涩 | 久久精品国产亚洲av四虎 | 亚洲欧美制服丝腿 | 成人黄片视频?免费 | a级毛片无码a免费 | 麻豆一姐视传媒短视频在线观看 | 国产精品成人无码a片免费网址 | 91制片厂果冻传媒天美传媒在线观看 | 亚洲精品久久久久久不卡精品小说 | 欧洲精品成人久久曰影片 | 国产精品自产拍在线网站 | 欧美性猛交xxxx黑人猛交 | 国产精品99久久久久久久 | 久久人妻一区二区三区精品毛 | 老司机精品视频一区二区 | 国产aⅴ激情无码久久久无码 | av熟女五十路息孑电影 | 免费人妻不卡中文字幕 | 国产做a爱一级毛片久久 | 国产亚洲精品久久综合阿香 | 成人一区天堂老师的秘密中文字幕bd | 国产99精品在线观看 | 久久无码潮喷A片无码高潮动漫 | 国产第一视频一区二区三区 | 国产成人无码a区在线观看导航 | 亚洲欧美日韩v在线观看不 亚洲欧美日韩v中文在线 | 日本一卡2卡3卡四卡精品网站 | 开心色婷婷 | 国产成人强伦免费视频网站 |