Set as Homepage - Add to Favorites

日韩欧美成人一区二区三区免费-日韩欧美成人免费中文字幕-日韩欧美成人免费观看-日韩欧美成人免-日韩欧美不卡一区-日韩欧美爱情中文字幕在线

【sex with pyschotherapist videos】Democrats' proposed Section 230 reform may not be as helpful as it looks

Former president Donald Trump fiercely advocated for getting rid of Section 230 in his final months in office. Now that Democrats control the White House and sex with pyschotherapist videosCongress, a few of them have proposed their own reforms to the landmark internet speech law.

"Section 230" is a shorthand reference to one piece of the 1996 Communications Decency Act that has come to be a key protection for online platforms in the 21st century. The most noteworthy snippet of Section 230 states that "[n]o provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider."

In other words, internet service providers like Comcast as well as platforms like Twitter or Facebook, aka "provider...of an interactive computer service," aren't legally responsible for posts made or shared by their users. While there's been plenty of disagreement over how to handle Section 230, most officials (and people impacted by bad behavior online) agree that the 25-year-old law's language is outdated and needs to change.

Senators Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), Mark Warner (D-VA), and Mazie Hirono (D-HI) introduced a bill called the SAFE TECH Act on Friday, which would alter Section 230 of the 1996 Communication Decency Act to give tech platforms like Facebook and Twitter more legal responsibility over the content posted by users. It's intended to curb things like "cyber-stalking, targeted harassment, and discrimination," but as with anything involving Section 230, there are major free speech implications, as well.

Broadly speaking, the SAFE TECH Act would open up more legal avenues to hold online platforms accountable for harmful content created by their users. It's not just one thing; the proposed legislation is designed to address a broad range of legal issues.

Mashable Light Speed Want more out-of-this world tech, space and science stories? Sign up for Mashable's weekly Light Speed newsletter. By clicking Sign Me Up, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Thanks for signing up!

One piece of it addresses paid speech, so Facebook or any other site that sells digital ad space would be held accountable for false or malicious ads someone paid to run on the site. Another piece gives victims of cyber-stalking or online harassment legal grounds to sue platforms that enabled those things, which is not currently the case under Section 230.

The legislation would also make it clear that Section 230 protections can't get in the way of enforcing civil rights laws, possibly lessening online discrimination. Victims of situations where online content contributed to "irreparable harm" could also seek relief, as could families of those who suffered wrongful deaths as a result of online activity. Even those who suffer human rights violations overseas could sue in U.S. courts if an American online platform is involved, with the Rohingya genocide used as an example.

All of that may sound great on paper, but as internet policy advocates pointed out to us in January and to TechCrunch in response to the SAFE TECH Act's introduction this week, any reform to such a key piece of legislation could have disastrous effects down the road.

Holding platforms accountable for paid speech might slow down false ads, but it could also hurt those who make an honest living off Patreon or Substack. The same goes for liability in harassment or discrimination cases, which could be a boon to victims but could also result in sites like Twitter becoming significantly less free for good-faith expression because their parent companies would like to avoid even the possibility of getting sued.

That's not to mention smaller sites whose content would also fall under the jurisdiction of a reformed Section 230, and who may not have the money or resources to back themselves up in court if it came to that. To be clear, the SAFE TECH Act is nowhere near guaranteed to become law anytime soon, especially with the glacial pace at which Congress does anything. But it's worth keeping in mind that even well-intentioned reforms, unlike some of those proposed by Republicans, could ultimately make the internet a worse place.

Topics Facebook X/Twitter

0.2074s , 14317.3046875 kb

Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【sex with pyschotherapist videos】Democrats' proposed Section 230 reform may not be as helpful as it looks,Public Opinion Flash  

Sitemap

Top 主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产无码传媒在线观看 | 国产99久久精品一区二区 | 麻豆蜜桃国产精品无码视频 | 自拍欧美在线综合另类 | 无码做爰视频WWW网站建设 | 午夜免费视频 | 国产人妖一区二区动漫黄片 | 国产熟妇精品伦一区二区三区 | 国产亚洲欧洲美女黄视频 | 波多野结衣久久久 | 成av人片在线观看天堂无码 | 女人18毛毛片兔费码A片 | 国产精品自拍网站 | 亚洲国产成人不卡在线播放 | 中国欧美日韩一区二区三区 | 国产毛片精品AV一区二区 | 国产美女丝袜高潮白浆 | 麻豆国产精品AV色拍综合 | 黑人巨茎大战俄罗斯白人美女 | 国产高清在线精品一区二区三区 | 东京热蜜桃一区二区 | 亚洲bt欧美bt中文字幕 | 嫩草亚洲精品在线观看 | 欧美一级手机免费观看片 | 国产成人无码视频一区二区三 | 国产中文字幕亚洲 | 爆乳上司julia中文字幕小说无遮挡观看美女天天 | 成人爽a毛片免费视频 | 99热精品久久只有 | 亚洲熟妇无码久久精品爱 | 成熟男女天天操夜 | 成年黄色免费网站 | 毛片网站视频 | 久久五月精品视频 | 国产精品无码天天爽视频 | 久久亚洲精品无码A片大香大香 | 伊人久久大香线蕉综合网站 | 人体无码一区二区三区 | 成人无码国产一区二区 | 精品久久aⅴ人妻中文 | 欧美亚洲中文字幕亚洲综合小综合 |