Set as Homepage - Add to Favorites

日韩欧美成人一区二区三区免费-日韩欧美成人免费中文字幕-日韩欧美成人免费观看-日韩欧美成人免-日韩欧美不卡一区-日韩欧美爱情中文字幕在线

【sex with pyschotherapist videos】Democrats' proposed Section 230 reform may not be as helpful as it looks

Former president Donald Trump fiercely advocated for getting rid of Section 230 in his final months in office. Now that Democrats control the White House and sex with pyschotherapist videosCongress, a few of them have proposed their own reforms to the landmark internet speech law.

"Section 230" is a shorthand reference to one piece of the 1996 Communications Decency Act that has come to be a key protection for online platforms in the 21st century. The most noteworthy snippet of Section 230 states that "[n]o provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider."

In other words, internet service providers like Comcast as well as platforms like Twitter or Facebook, aka "provider...of an interactive computer service," aren't legally responsible for posts made or shared by their users. While there's been plenty of disagreement over how to handle Section 230, most officials (and people impacted by bad behavior online) agree that the 25-year-old law's language is outdated and needs to change.

Senators Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), Mark Warner (D-VA), and Mazie Hirono (D-HI) introduced a bill called the SAFE TECH Act on Friday, which would alter Section 230 of the 1996 Communication Decency Act to give tech platforms like Facebook and Twitter more legal responsibility over the content posted by users. It's intended to curb things like "cyber-stalking, targeted harassment, and discrimination," but as with anything involving Section 230, there are major free speech implications, as well.

Broadly speaking, the SAFE TECH Act would open up more legal avenues to hold online platforms accountable for harmful content created by their users. It's not just one thing; the proposed legislation is designed to address a broad range of legal issues.

Mashable Light Speed Want more out-of-this world tech, space and science stories? Sign up for Mashable's weekly Light Speed newsletter. By clicking Sign Me Up, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Thanks for signing up!

One piece of it addresses paid speech, so Facebook or any other site that sells digital ad space would be held accountable for false or malicious ads someone paid to run on the site. Another piece gives victims of cyber-stalking or online harassment legal grounds to sue platforms that enabled those things, which is not currently the case under Section 230.

The legislation would also make it clear that Section 230 protections can't get in the way of enforcing civil rights laws, possibly lessening online discrimination. Victims of situations where online content contributed to "irreparable harm" could also seek relief, as could families of those who suffered wrongful deaths as a result of online activity. Even those who suffer human rights violations overseas could sue in U.S. courts if an American online platform is involved, with the Rohingya genocide used as an example.

All of that may sound great on paper, but as internet policy advocates pointed out to us in January and to TechCrunch in response to the SAFE TECH Act's introduction this week, any reform to such a key piece of legislation could have disastrous effects down the road.

Holding platforms accountable for paid speech might slow down false ads, but it could also hurt those who make an honest living off Patreon or Substack. The same goes for liability in harassment or discrimination cases, which could be a boon to victims but could also result in sites like Twitter becoming significantly less free for good-faith expression because their parent companies would like to avoid even the possibility of getting sued.

That's not to mention smaller sites whose content would also fall under the jurisdiction of a reformed Section 230, and who may not have the money or resources to back themselves up in court if it came to that. To be clear, the SAFE TECH Act is nowhere near guaranteed to become law anytime soon, especially with the glacial pace at which Congress does anything. But it's worth keeping in mind that even well-intentioned reforms, unlike some of those proposed by Republicans, could ultimately make the internet a worse place.

Topics Facebook X/Twitter

0.2074s , 14317.3046875 kb

Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【sex with pyschotherapist videos】Democrats' proposed Section 230 reform may not be as helpful as it looks,Public Opinion Flash  

Sitemap

Top 主站蜘蛛池模板: 日本午夜成年在线网站 | 日韩在线二区 | 国产精品剧情原创麻豆国产 | 另类精品视频一区二区 | 国产在线看不卡一区二区 | 精品亚洲av无码区最新 | 日韩福利在线 | 成年女人18级毛片毛片免费观看 | 99热在线观看 久久伊一区二区 | 亚洲欧美另类激情 | 久久99国产精品成人 | 国产成人精品高清 | 熟妇高潮精品一区二区三区 | 国产精品高清一区二区不卡 | 精品天堂久久久久久无码尤物 | 国产一级第一级毛片 | A片做爰片仑理片免费看 | 青青国产揄拍视频在线观看 | 91探花在线 | 国产va欧美va在线观看 | 狠狠狠的在啪线香蕉 | 91麻豆精品无码人妻系列 | 出差我被公高潮A片1000部 | 丰满少妇人妻久久久久久 | 50岁人妻丰满熟妇αv无码 | 国产99久久99热这里只有精品15 | 潮喷取精10次gay在线观看 | 狠狠色丁香婷婷综合久久来 | 日韩爆乳一区二区无码 | 国产91白浆在线观看 | 国产一级毛片潘金莲的奶头 | 日韩一区二区三区在线视频观看 | 国产中文字幕乱码免在线观看 | 日本又色又爽又黄的A片视频免费 | 欧美日韩国产在线观看播放 | 久久久久久中文字幕大全免费看 | 综合激情五月丁香久久 | 久久久久久久精品成人免费a片 | 国产69精品久久久久一区 | 精品视频一区二区三区四区五区 | 国内精品久久 |