Set as Homepage - Add to Favorites

日韩欧美成人一区二区三区免费-日韩欧美成人免费中文字幕-日韩欧美成人免费观看-日韩欧美成人免-日韩欧美不卡一区-日韩欧美爱情中文字幕在线

【?????? ????????】What really happens if Republicans get rid of Section 230

Republicans are ?????? ????????crying “censorship” to pressure Facebook, Twitter, and Google to let them spread misinformation. But if they really got rid of Section 230, they’d be dragging everyone else down with them.

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg, Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey, and Google/Alphabet CEO Sundar Pichai appeared remotely before the Senate Commerce Committee on Wednesday for yet another congressional hearing on content moderation and supposed anti-conservative bias.

My colleague already outlined how the hearing, held just days before the 2020 presidential elections, was a sham.

The title of the hearing was “Does Section 230's Sweeping Immunity Enable Big Tech Bad Behavior?” Some conservatives say that Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996 is the reason why the Big Tech companies can get away with “censoring” their content without facing legal repercussions.

That's literally the opposite of what’s going on.

What is Section 230?

Basically, it protects tech companies from legal liability for what their users post on their platforms, with exceptions when it comes to illegal activity such as copyright infringement, sex trafficking, and other federal crimes. It puts the legal liability on the user who posts the content, not the company that hosts it.

Without Section 230, Big Tech companies would be more cautious about what’s allowed on their platforms. Some might even abandon user-generated content. Why allow it if the legal threats aren’t worth the trouble?

Mashable Light Speed Want more out-of-this world tech, space and science stories? Sign up for Mashable's weekly Light Speed newsletter. By clicking Sign Me Up, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Thanks for signing up!

Big Tech companies aren't legally liable for, say, harmful QAnon conspiraciesand President Donald Trump’s coronavirus misinformationthanks to Section 230.

When they do take down or limit the reach of content, it's their choice — they're notrequired by law to do so. Section 230 gives companies the ability to moderate as they please. That's why complaints about them violating the First Amendment are meritless. They have a right to not host certain types of content.

And it's not just Big Tech that would be affected. Do you have a blog? Without Section 230, you could be held liable for what your readers say in the comments section.

Getting rid of Section 230 might lead to the censorship of everyone,in that nobody would be able to share their ideas and opinions on social media.

The same old story

We’ve heard most of what was discussed in Wednesday's hearing before. I’ve covered congressional hearing after congressional hearing where Republicans spend the entire day grilling major tech CEOs on personal grudgeslike perceived anti-conservativebias in big tech – despite evidence to the contrary.

The pressure from Republicans has often led to “overcompensation,” as Democratic Sen. Brian Schatz correctly put it, from Silicon Valley. To curry favor with conservatives, companies like Facebookwill hire Republican operatives and provide a more lenient interpretation of its policies for personalities and organizations on the right.

After these congressional hearings on Big Tech, it's often pointed outhow our elected officials are old, out-of-touch, and lacking any tech-savvy. I’ve written about many of these hearings and have made mention of this myself.

But, that’s not what’s happening here. Republican lawmakers know what they’re doing.

Take Ted Cruz, for example. Earlier today, he was promotingthe congressional hearing like a boxing promoter hyping a heavyweight title match. It was Cruz, and ostensibly the conservative base, vs. Twitter, i.e. Big Tech.

Big Tech is starting to crack down on right-wing misinformation — although it still spreads pretty easily. If Republicans can't get their way, it seems like they're ready to watch the entire internet go up in flames.

Related Video: How to recognize and avoid fake news

Topics Facebook Google Social Media X/Twitter

0.1227s , 9925.6953125 kb

Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【?????? ????????】What really happens if Republicans get rid of Section 230,Public Opinion Flash  

Sitemap

Top 主站蜘蛛池模板: 四虎影视久久久免费观看 | 日本无码一区二区二区 | a级国产乱理伦片野外 | 无码一区二区三区AⅤ免费蜜桃视 | 女同hd系列中文字幕 | 人妻无码a∨中文字幕 | AAAAA特级| 久久五月天性爱视频 | 精品日产一卡2卡3卡4卡乱码 | 综合人妻久久一区二区精品 | 青青草国产成人99久久 | 国产日本一区二区三区 | 精品国产VA久久久久久久冰 | 成人精品视频在线观看不卡 | 99国内精品久久久久久久 | 日本xxxx综合欧美日韩国产一区二区 | 免费看无码午夜福利片 | 91麻豆精品国产自产在线观看 | 国产一区二区久久精品 | av免费大片在线观看 | 日韩系列av专区一区二区三区 | 蜜桃麻豆久久国产人妻 | 亚洲国产最新在线一区二区 | 国产91欧美一区二区精品 | 亚洲婷婷综合 | 国产美女被爽到高潮激情免费A片 | 91亚洲美女天堂 | 中文字幕乱倫视频 | 欧美精品人妻aⅴ在线观视频 | 激情五月婷婷小说 | 国产一级片网站 | 中文字幕高清在线中文字幕 | 亚洲综合无码一区二区三区 | 精品人妻无码视频中文字幕一区二区三区 | 久久大香香蕉国产免费网站 | jizz国产丝袜18老师美女 | 超清乱码中文字幕 | 国产欧美日韩综合第一区第二区 | 国产a一级无码毛片一区二区三区 | 免费人妻无码不卡中文字幕系列 | 高潮毛片无遮挡免费高清 |