Set as Homepage - Add to Favorites

日韩欧美成人一区二区三区免费-日韩欧美成人免费中文字幕-日韩欧美成人免费观看-日韩欧美成人免-日韩欧美不卡一区-日韩欧美爱情中文字幕在线

【?????? ????????】What really happens if Republicans get rid of Section 230

Republicans are ?????? ????????crying “censorship” to pressure Facebook, Twitter, and Google to let them spread misinformation. But if they really got rid of Section 230, they’d be dragging everyone else down with them.

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg, Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey, and Google/Alphabet CEO Sundar Pichai appeared remotely before the Senate Commerce Committee on Wednesday for yet another congressional hearing on content moderation and supposed anti-conservative bias.

My colleague already outlined how the hearing, held just days before the 2020 presidential elections, was a sham.

The title of the hearing was “Does Section 230's Sweeping Immunity Enable Big Tech Bad Behavior?” Some conservatives say that Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996 is the reason why the Big Tech companies can get away with “censoring” their content without facing legal repercussions.

That's literally the opposite of what’s going on.

What is Section 230?

Basically, it protects tech companies from legal liability for what their users post on their platforms, with exceptions when it comes to illegal activity such as copyright infringement, sex trafficking, and other federal crimes. It puts the legal liability on the user who posts the content, not the company that hosts it.

Without Section 230, Big Tech companies would be more cautious about what’s allowed on their platforms. Some might even abandon user-generated content. Why allow it if the legal threats aren’t worth the trouble?

Mashable Light Speed Want more out-of-this world tech, space and science stories? Sign up for Mashable's weekly Light Speed newsletter. By clicking Sign Me Up, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Thanks for signing up!

Big Tech companies aren't legally liable for, say, harmful QAnon conspiraciesand President Donald Trump’s coronavirus misinformationthanks to Section 230.

When they do take down or limit the reach of content, it's their choice — they're notrequired by law to do so. Section 230 gives companies the ability to moderate as they please. That's why complaints about them violating the First Amendment are meritless. They have a right to not host certain types of content.

And it's not just Big Tech that would be affected. Do you have a blog? Without Section 230, you could be held liable for what your readers say in the comments section.

Getting rid of Section 230 might lead to the censorship of everyone,in that nobody would be able to share their ideas and opinions on social media.

The same old story

We’ve heard most of what was discussed in Wednesday's hearing before. I’ve covered congressional hearing after congressional hearing where Republicans spend the entire day grilling major tech CEOs on personal grudgeslike perceived anti-conservativebias in big tech – despite evidence to the contrary.

The pressure from Republicans has often led to “overcompensation,” as Democratic Sen. Brian Schatz correctly put it, from Silicon Valley. To curry favor with conservatives, companies like Facebookwill hire Republican operatives and provide a more lenient interpretation of its policies for personalities and organizations on the right.

After these congressional hearings on Big Tech, it's often pointed outhow our elected officials are old, out-of-touch, and lacking any tech-savvy. I’ve written about many of these hearings and have made mention of this myself.

But, that’s not what’s happening here. Republican lawmakers know what they’re doing.

Take Ted Cruz, for example. Earlier today, he was promotingthe congressional hearing like a boxing promoter hyping a heavyweight title match. It was Cruz, and ostensibly the conservative base, vs. Twitter, i.e. Big Tech.

Big Tech is starting to crack down on right-wing misinformation — although it still spreads pretty easily. If Republicans can't get their way, it seems like they're ready to watch the entire internet go up in flames.

Related Video: How to recognize and avoid fake news

Topics Facebook Google Social Media X/Twitter

0.1227s , 9925.6953125 kb

Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【?????? ????????】What really happens if Republicans get rid of Section 230,Public Opinion Flash  

Sitemap

Top 主站蜘蛛池模板: 欧美日韩国产一区二 | 亚洲A片V一区二区三区有声 | 欧美日韩B区| 国产精品ⅴa在线观看无码 国产精品ⅴa在线观看无码电影 | 久久人妻夜夜做天天爽 | 99亚洲精品卡2卡三卡4卡2卡 | 日本国产高清网色视频网站 | 亚洲AV国产精品无码精 | a级毛片毛片免费看 | 波多野结衣乳巨码无在线播放bd国语手机免费观看 | 亚洲午夜无码久久 | 99久久精品免费观看区一 | 国产精品久久久久久亚洲影视久久精品www人人爽人人国产精 | 成人国产一区二区三区 | 麻豆久久久午夜一区二区 | 国产免费人aa片片a片 | 成人毛片在线播放 | 四虎精品永久在线 | 国产精品国产三级国产普通话对白 | 日本一大新区免费高清不卡 | 久久久久无码 | 91大神大战丝袜美女在线观看 | 日韩亚洲第九页亚洲色图激情校园 | 国产高清在线精品一本大道 | av无码人妻中文字幕 | 精品少妇人妻av免费久久洗澡 | 国产免费又色又爽又黄的小说 | 国产乱国产乱老熟300部视频 | 国产又色又爽又黄又免费 | 亚洲熟女www一区二 亚洲熟女www一区二区三区 | 日韩一级片网址 | 无码国内精品人妻少妇蜜桃视频 | 国产精品变态重口在线 | 国产精品乱子伦一区二区 | 日本三级大乳舌吻 | 四虎国产永久在线精品免费观看 | 粉嫩无码国产在线观看 | 国产麻豆精品一区二区三区免费在线观看 | 精品国产成人三级 | 国产成人精品日本亚洲网址 | 久久久久国产黄色网站 |