Set as Homepage - Add to Favorites

日韩欧美成人一区二区三区免费-日韩欧美成人免费中文字幕-日韩欧美成人免费观看-日韩欧美成人免-日韩欧美不卡一区-日韩欧美爱情中文字幕在线

【?????? ????????】What really happens if Republicans get rid of Section 230

Republicans are ?????? ????????crying “censorship” to pressure Facebook, Twitter, and Google to let them spread misinformation. But if they really got rid of Section 230, they’d be dragging everyone else down with them.

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg, Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey, and Google/Alphabet CEO Sundar Pichai appeared remotely before the Senate Commerce Committee on Wednesday for yet another congressional hearing on content moderation and supposed anti-conservative bias.

My colleague already outlined how the hearing, held just days before the 2020 presidential elections, was a sham.

The title of the hearing was “Does Section 230's Sweeping Immunity Enable Big Tech Bad Behavior?” Some conservatives say that Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996 is the reason why the Big Tech companies can get away with “censoring” their content without facing legal repercussions.

That's literally the opposite of what’s going on.

What is Section 230?

Basically, it protects tech companies from legal liability for what their users post on their platforms, with exceptions when it comes to illegal activity such as copyright infringement, sex trafficking, and other federal crimes. It puts the legal liability on the user who posts the content, not the company that hosts it.

Without Section 230, Big Tech companies would be more cautious about what’s allowed on their platforms. Some might even abandon user-generated content. Why allow it if the legal threats aren’t worth the trouble?

Mashable Light Speed Want more out-of-this world tech, space and science stories? Sign up for Mashable's weekly Light Speed newsletter. By clicking Sign Me Up, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Thanks for signing up!

Big Tech companies aren't legally liable for, say, harmful QAnon conspiraciesand President Donald Trump’s coronavirus misinformationthanks to Section 230.

When they do take down or limit the reach of content, it's their choice — they're notrequired by law to do so. Section 230 gives companies the ability to moderate as they please. That's why complaints about them violating the First Amendment are meritless. They have a right to not host certain types of content.

And it's not just Big Tech that would be affected. Do you have a blog? Without Section 230, you could be held liable for what your readers say in the comments section.

Getting rid of Section 230 might lead to the censorship of everyone,in that nobody would be able to share their ideas and opinions on social media.

The same old story

We’ve heard most of what was discussed in Wednesday's hearing before. I’ve covered congressional hearing after congressional hearing where Republicans spend the entire day grilling major tech CEOs on personal grudgeslike perceived anti-conservativebias in big tech – despite evidence to the contrary.

The pressure from Republicans has often led to “overcompensation,” as Democratic Sen. Brian Schatz correctly put it, from Silicon Valley. To curry favor with conservatives, companies like Facebookwill hire Republican operatives and provide a more lenient interpretation of its policies for personalities and organizations on the right.

After these congressional hearings on Big Tech, it's often pointed outhow our elected officials are old, out-of-touch, and lacking any tech-savvy. I’ve written about many of these hearings and have made mention of this myself.

But, that’s not what’s happening here. Republican lawmakers know what they’re doing.

Take Ted Cruz, for example. Earlier today, he was promotingthe congressional hearing like a boxing promoter hyping a heavyweight title match. It was Cruz, and ostensibly the conservative base, vs. Twitter, i.e. Big Tech.

Big Tech is starting to crack down on right-wing misinformation — although it still spreads pretty easily. If Republicans can't get their way, it seems like they're ready to watch the entire internet go up in flames.

Related Video: How to recognize and avoid fake news

Topics Facebook Google Social Media X/Twitter

0.1227s , 9925.6953125 kb

Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【?????? ????????】What really happens if Republicans get rid of Section 230,Public Opinion Flash  

Sitemap

Top 主站蜘蛛池模板: 麻豆国产第二 | 无码又爽又刺激a片涩涩 | 国产福利视频一区 | 亚洲欧美国产精品久久久久久久 | 国产精品国产三级国产无码 | 国产精品日本免费视频 | 国产四区不卡在线视频播放 | 岛国无码在线观看 | 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡乱码网站导航 | 国产精品毛片一区视频入口在线成人网站黑人 | 久久国产精品影院 | 成人免费无码大片a毛片抽搐色欲 | 麻豆人妻无码性色av专区 | 国产亚洲欧美精品永久 | 伦理片天堂eeuss影院 | 国产精品一区在线观看你懂的 | 日韩无码精品专区 | 国产精品无码av电影 | 久久爱手机在线观看 | 久久久久精品国产麻豆 | 欧美日韩国产一区二 | 精品人妻中文字幕无码蜜桃臀 | 日韩一区二区视频在线观看 | 久久国产香蕉女人 | 成人片在线观看无码 | 日本又色又爽又黄的A片小说 | 国产一级生活片 | 亚洲日本精品国产第一区二区 | 激情影院内射美女 | 久久久91精品国产一区二区 | 麻豆文化传媒网站入口 | 91色交视频 | 久久曰视频 | 97av麻豆蜜桃一区二区 | 日韩人妻av无码综合一区 | 中文字幕免费视频 | 国产成人91精品免费看片 | 亚洲 欧美 综合 另类 中字 | 精东影视文化传媒公司 | 亚洲日本va一区二区三区 | 国产人伦人妻精品一区二区 |