Set as Homepage - Add to Favorites

日韩欧美成人一区二区三区免费-日韩欧美成人免费中文字幕-日韩欧美成人免费观看-日韩欧美成人免-日韩欧美不卡一区-日韩欧美爱情中文字幕在线

【xem phim khiêu dam mà stomy dannie ?óng】After Kennedy's retirement, are we entering 'Handmaid's Tale' territory?

Justice Anthony Kennedy announced his retirement from the Supreme Court on xem phim khiêu dam mà stomy dannie ?óngWednesday, effective July 31. Given that Donald Trump gets to pick his replacement, and Mitch McConnell controls the Senate confirmation process, it seems all but certain that the next judge on America's all-important bench will be a hardline conservative.

Kennedy, appointed by President Reagan, was something of a conservative jurist himself. He has voted with the court's four other conservatives in every major decision of the Trump era thus far. But he was also the court's so-called swing vote; his decisions saved Roe v. Wade in 1992 and instituted gay marriage as the law of the land in 2015.

SEE ALSO: Everyone is comparing Trump's border policy to 'Handmaid's Tale,' even the creator

There's a strong chance that any replacement for Kennedy picked by Trump will vote to overturn Roe v. Wade the first chance they get. That would mean no more guaranteed access to abortion for American women; Republican states would then be likely to outlaw it, sending women in those states back to the unsafe abortion practices of the pre-Roe era. Decades of progress on LGBTQ rights in the court could also be erased. And then where will we be?

For many on Wednesday, the answer was obvious: we'll be in Gilead, the misogynistic nightmare future America of Margaret Atwood's classic The Handmaid's Tale.

Ironically, CNN's Brian Stelter had just declared Gilead comparisons to be "fear-mongering" 24 hours previously, in response to citizenship-testing roadblocks in New England (Atwood's location for Gilead). Thousands immediately chimed in.

It's fair to say the tweet has not aged well.

So is it fear-mongering to bring up Handmaid's Talein the context of today's America? Not in the slightest, for a whole host of reasons.

Writing in 1984, Atwood outlined a chilling scenario for how the United States could turn into a medieval republic that regards women as mere reproductive chattel. As I explained a year ago, this scenario seems more relevant now than ever -- and that was even before the border clampdowns and the rightward lurch of the court.

Here's how it goes down in the novel: a secretive patriarchal cabal launches a violent attack on Congress. The attack is blamed on Muslim extremists. The Constitution is suspended. Women and the men who support them are denied access to credit cards, which in Atwood's future America is the only way you can buy anything.

Mashable Trend Report Decode what’s viral, what’s next, and what it all means. Sign up for Mashable’s weekly Trend Report newsletter. By clicking Sign Me Up, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Thanks for signing up!

Meanwhile, fertility rates are dropping, likely due to chemicals in the environment, and the men in charge want to control access to women who can still give birth. Hey presto: handmaids.

Are these things literallygoing to happen the way Atwood described? Probably not. But does every sentence in the paragraph above seem plausible? Is there a real-world analog for everything in it? Absolutely. One need only think of the Patriot Act, or the fact that infertility is on the rise in China, or that women weren't allowed credit cards until 1974, or that a woman's credit score still suffers more after a divorce than a man's.

When Trump's preference for gaslighting us with obvious lies, a.k.a., "alternative facts" became clear immediately following his inauguration, many of us, myself included, reached for George Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-Four. "The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears," Orwell wrote. "It was their final, most essential command."

SEE ALSO: How Trump has already taken us into full-on 'Nineteen Eighty-Four' territory

This seems an apt comparison; Orwell's focus was mostly on the totalitarian desire to control truth, a desire Trump clearly shares. (Orwell was obsessed with language as a means of political control; not so much with the surveillance state part of the book.)

Does this mean we're heading for Orwell's Oceania, with all that implies -- the Thought Police, the two-way telescreens, the wartime rationing? I'd argue not. But the essential spirit of Nineteen Eighty-Fouris alive and well, so much so that you can't dismiss the comparison outright.

Could there be an element of unconscious sexism in dismissing comparisons to a woman's dystopia more readily?

Both Orwell and Atwood explicitly wrote their dystopias as warnings, not predictions. "Back in 1984, the main premise [of Handmaid's Tale] seemed — even to me — fairly outrageous," Atwood wrote in a new introduction to the book in 2017. And yet, she added, "having been born in 1939 and come to consciousness during World War II, I knew that established orders could vanish overnight. Change could also be as fast as lightning. 'It can’t happen here' could not be depended on: Anything could happen anywhere, given the circumstances."

Kennedy's retirement is just such a vanishing of the established order. In the space of a day, we are suddenly made aware how fragile the liberal values of modern America are. In poll after poll over the years, clear majorities of Americans favor a woman's right to choose, although they're divided on what restrictions should be in place. But under a Supreme Court with one judge changed, that may not matter.

If Roe v. Wade is overturned, legal analysts have pointed out, some 20 Republican states stand ready to outlaw abortion outright. This will not end abortion, of course; it will mean more women taking flight to Democratic states, or relying on the hideous old-fashioned backstreet abortion techniques that were common before Roe.

And what happens then? Will religious conservatives in the Mike Pence mold be satisfied and take a backseat? Or can we imagine more encroachments on women's rights being enshrined in law once the nation's top court has signaled it won't stop them? Birth control is already in the sights of many. Pharmacists are legally allowed to deny it to women according to their conscience. Last year one state lawmaker described women as mere "hosts" for children.

No one, least of all Atwood, can pretend to predict the future. But that also means we can't pretend to know that a Gilead-like repressive patriarchal state isn'tin our future, and we certainly can't call the threat over-hyped. The only thing we can reasonably do is fight like hell at every possible juncture to prevent the warning from becoming reality.


Featured Video For You

0.1317s , 8101.5234375 kb

Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【xem phim khiêu dam mà stomy dannie ?óng】After Kennedy's retirement, are we entering 'Handmaid's Tale' territory?,Public Opinion Flash  

Sitemap

Top 主站蜘蛛池模板: 1区2区3区产品乱码免费下载 | 成人图片视频在线91小视频在线观看 | 无码吃奶揉捏奶头高潮视频 | 韩国精品福利一区二区 | 日韩在线欧美高清一区 | 日韩做A爰片久久毛片A片毛茸茸 | 91精品人妻久久 | 成人h动漫精品一区二区无 成人h动漫精品一区二区无码 | 国产亚洲成AV人片在线观黄桃 | 强制高潮18xxxx按摩 | 国产偷国产偷亚洲高清在线 | 性色做爰片在线观看WW | 二区黄色地下一级片 | 韩国理论疯狂少妇2做爰 | 国产精品一级毛片无码a片 国产精品一级毛片在线不卡 | 五月丁香综合网站婷婷 | 日本黄H兄妹H动漫一区二区三区 | 中文字幕无码不卡一区二区三区 | 色老头成人免费综合视频 | 精品一区二区三区婷婷月色 | 亚洲色欲色欲在线大片 | 免费啪视频观免费视频 | 精品无码不卡中文字幕 | 久久精品无码一区二区日韩av | 久久久久国产线看观看精品 | 久99久精品免费视频热77 | 日韩在线成年视频人网站观看 | 国产精品视频久久视频小视频香蕉视频 | 丁香婷婷久久大 | 国产成人精品午夜一区 | 国产精品日韩欧美一区2区3区 | 久久国产精品视频一区 | 亚洲国产情侣一区二区三区 | 久久精品亚洲欧美日韩久久国产亚洲 | 国产真人免费无码AV在线观看 | 无码精品人妻一区二区三区免费 | 精品成人在线观看 | 波多野结衣免费视频观看 | 国产丝袜美女一区二 | 免费看成人www的网站软件 | 搡女人真爽免费视频大全软件 |