Set as Homepage - Add to Favorites

日韩欧美成人一区二区三区免费-日韩欧美成人免费中文字幕-日韩欧美成人免费观看-日韩欧美成人免-日韩欧美不卡一区-日韩欧美爱情中文字幕在线

【xem phim khiêu dam mà stomy dannie ?óng】After Kennedy's retirement, are we entering 'Handmaid's Tale' territory?

Justice Anthony Kennedy announced his retirement from the Supreme Court on xem phim khiêu dam mà stomy dannie ?óngWednesday, effective July 31. Given that Donald Trump gets to pick his replacement, and Mitch McConnell controls the Senate confirmation process, it seems all but certain that the next judge on America's all-important bench will be a hardline conservative.

Kennedy, appointed by President Reagan, was something of a conservative jurist himself. He has voted with the court's four other conservatives in every major decision of the Trump era thus far. But he was also the court's so-called swing vote; his decisions saved Roe v. Wade in 1992 and instituted gay marriage as the law of the land in 2015.

SEE ALSO: Everyone is comparing Trump's border policy to 'Handmaid's Tale,' even the creator

There's a strong chance that any replacement for Kennedy picked by Trump will vote to overturn Roe v. Wade the first chance they get. That would mean no more guaranteed access to abortion for American women; Republican states would then be likely to outlaw it, sending women in those states back to the unsafe abortion practices of the pre-Roe era. Decades of progress on LGBTQ rights in the court could also be erased. And then where will we be?

For many on Wednesday, the answer was obvious: we'll be in Gilead, the misogynistic nightmare future America of Margaret Atwood's classic The Handmaid's Tale.

Ironically, CNN's Brian Stelter had just declared Gilead comparisons to be "fear-mongering" 24 hours previously, in response to citizenship-testing roadblocks in New England (Atwood's location for Gilead). Thousands immediately chimed in.

It's fair to say the tweet has not aged well.

So is it fear-mongering to bring up Handmaid's Talein the context of today's America? Not in the slightest, for a whole host of reasons.

Writing in 1984, Atwood outlined a chilling scenario for how the United States could turn into a medieval republic that regards women as mere reproductive chattel. As I explained a year ago, this scenario seems more relevant now than ever -- and that was even before the border clampdowns and the rightward lurch of the court.

Here's how it goes down in the novel: a secretive patriarchal cabal launches a violent attack on Congress. The attack is blamed on Muslim extremists. The Constitution is suspended. Women and the men who support them are denied access to credit cards, which in Atwood's future America is the only way you can buy anything.

Mashable Trend Report Decode what’s viral, what’s next, and what it all means. Sign up for Mashable’s weekly Trend Report newsletter. By clicking Sign Me Up, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Thanks for signing up!

Meanwhile, fertility rates are dropping, likely due to chemicals in the environment, and the men in charge want to control access to women who can still give birth. Hey presto: handmaids.

Are these things literallygoing to happen the way Atwood described? Probably not. But does every sentence in the paragraph above seem plausible? Is there a real-world analog for everything in it? Absolutely. One need only think of the Patriot Act, or the fact that infertility is on the rise in China, or that women weren't allowed credit cards until 1974, or that a woman's credit score still suffers more after a divorce than a man's.

When Trump's preference for gaslighting us with obvious lies, a.k.a., "alternative facts" became clear immediately following his inauguration, many of us, myself included, reached for George Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-Four. "The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears," Orwell wrote. "It was their final, most essential command."

SEE ALSO: How Trump has already taken us into full-on 'Nineteen Eighty-Four' territory

This seems an apt comparison; Orwell's focus was mostly on the totalitarian desire to control truth, a desire Trump clearly shares. (Orwell was obsessed with language as a means of political control; not so much with the surveillance state part of the book.)

Does this mean we're heading for Orwell's Oceania, with all that implies -- the Thought Police, the two-way telescreens, the wartime rationing? I'd argue not. But the essential spirit of Nineteen Eighty-Fouris alive and well, so much so that you can't dismiss the comparison outright.

Could there be an element of unconscious sexism in dismissing comparisons to a woman's dystopia more readily?

Both Orwell and Atwood explicitly wrote their dystopias as warnings, not predictions. "Back in 1984, the main premise [of Handmaid's Tale] seemed — even to me — fairly outrageous," Atwood wrote in a new introduction to the book in 2017. And yet, she added, "having been born in 1939 and come to consciousness during World War II, I knew that established orders could vanish overnight. Change could also be as fast as lightning. 'It can’t happen here' could not be depended on: Anything could happen anywhere, given the circumstances."

Kennedy's retirement is just such a vanishing of the established order. In the space of a day, we are suddenly made aware how fragile the liberal values of modern America are. In poll after poll over the years, clear majorities of Americans favor a woman's right to choose, although they're divided on what restrictions should be in place. But under a Supreme Court with one judge changed, that may not matter.

If Roe v. Wade is overturned, legal analysts have pointed out, some 20 Republican states stand ready to outlaw abortion outright. This will not end abortion, of course; it will mean more women taking flight to Democratic states, or relying on the hideous old-fashioned backstreet abortion techniques that were common before Roe.

And what happens then? Will religious conservatives in the Mike Pence mold be satisfied and take a backseat? Or can we imagine more encroachments on women's rights being enshrined in law once the nation's top court has signaled it won't stop them? Birth control is already in the sights of many. Pharmacists are legally allowed to deny it to women according to their conscience. Last year one state lawmaker described women as mere "hosts" for children.

No one, least of all Atwood, can pretend to predict the future. But that also means we can't pretend to know that a Gilead-like repressive patriarchal state isn'tin our future, and we certainly can't call the threat over-hyped. The only thing we can reasonably do is fight like hell at every possible juncture to prevent the warning from becoming reality.


Featured Video For You

0.1317s , 8101.5234375 kb

Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【xem phim khiêu dam mà stomy dannie ?óng】After Kennedy's retirement, are we entering 'Handmaid's Tale' territory?,Public Opinion Flash  

Sitemap

Top 主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产伦精品一区二区三区妓女原神 | 一本道卡一卡二卡三乱码 - 八 | 欧美成人免费观看久久 | 中文国产乱码在线人妻一区二区 | 99久久精品国产亚洲麻豆 | 亚洲成a人片在线观看无码3d | 91精品久久人人 | 精东视频影视传媒制作 | 国产a∨天天免费观看美女 国产a∨天天免费观看美女18 | 久久久国产成人精品蜜臀a 久久久国产成人一区二区 久久久国产打桩机 | 2024精品久久久久久中文字 | 国产亚洲精品久久久久的角色 | 亚洲成a人片在线观看你懂的 | 国产欧美韩国日本一区 | 国产成人久久久精品二区三区 | 国产日韩一区二区A片 | 国产91在线精品国自产在线 | 精品天天中文字幕人妻 | 麻豆日本三级国产99久久久国产精品 | 伊人影院精品一二三 | 国禁国产you女视频网站 | 色窝窝亚洲AV在线观看 | 欧美唯美国产伦综合 | 欧洲精品成人久久曰影片 | 久久久久久精品一区二区三区日本 | 欧美成人精品欧美一级乱黄 | 国产欧美精品综合一区 | 巨乳波霸在线中文字幕 | 国产精品制服诱惑 | 日本久久高清一区二区三区毛片 | 国产美女丝袜高潮白浆 | 国产精品制服丝袜亚洲欧美 | 精品韩剧电影资源全集 | 成片在线看一区二区草莓 | 亚洲天堂网站 | 在线观看特色大片免费视频 | 亚洲国产综合久久久精品 | 看你懂的巨臀中文字幕一区二区 | 久久久久久久久久久精品尤物 | 96精品视频 | 成人无码一区二区片 |