Set as Homepage - Add to Favorites

日韩欧美成人一区二区三区免费-日韩欧美成人免费中文字幕-日韩欧美成人免费观看-日韩欧美成人免-日韩欧美不卡一区-日韩欧美爱情中文字幕在线

【porno bedava izle】Oil giant Exxon enters New York court for alleged climate fraud

Exxon is porno bedava izlein hot water.

The State of New York sued the Exxon Mobil Corporation for fraud, and the oil giant could not squirm out of what will almost certainly become a historic trial. New York alleges Exxon deceived its investors about how much looming climate change regulations will likely hurt the oil giant's profits as the planet continues to relentlessly warm. The oil company goes to trial on Tuesday at the neoclassically-designed New York State Supreme Court in the dead center of Manhattan's Financial District — a place where fraud, greed, and deception have, historically, abounded.

"We’re seeing the company for the first time confronted in open courts with the evidence of its climate deception," said Carroll Muffett, the president of the Center for International Environmental Law.


You May Also Like

Over the past few years, a flood of evidence has come to light revealing how Exxon has known for decades that rising carbon dioxide emissions would heat the planet and alter a stable climate. At the same time, the corporation repeatedly sowed doubt about climate science and actively mislead the public about the severity of climate change.

Now, for the first time, the Exxon is on trial for climate deception, though not for the ways described above. New York Attorney General Leticia James has employed a powerful, nearly 100-year-old anti-fraud law, called the Martin Act, to reveal how the oil giant misled investors about the future cost of extracting and selling fossil fuels.

"This is at its heart a case about fraud," said Muffett.

"This case seeks redress for a longstanding fraudulent scheme by Exxon, one of the world’s largest oil and gas companies...concerning the company’s management of the risks posed to its business by climate change regulation," the state wrote in a complaint last year.

Original image replaced with Mashable logoOriginal image has been replaced. Credit: Mashable

Specifically, the state alleges that Exxon, in forecasting how much money its fossil fuel operations would make in the future, did not faithfully account for how much expected climate change regulations (like a tax on carbon or on certain types of carbon-heavy fuels) would reduce demand for fossil fuel and hurt the company's bottom line, and ultimately its investors. Exxon calls the assumed price of carbon emissions from government regulations CO2 "proxy costs."

In New York's 91-page complaint, the state cites a number of ways Exxon misguided investors, particularly by grossly underestimating how much it would cost to extract oil from 14 oil sand projects in Alberta, Canada — one the largest oil reserves on Earth. Exxon lowballed these costs by a whopping $25 billion, argued the state.

"If the investors had known what the real cost of climate change regulations would be, they might not have invested in Exxon," said Patrick Parenteau, a professor of law and senior counsel in the Environmental and Natural Resources Law Clinic at Vermont Law School.

"This is at its heart a case about fraud"

Sometimes, the state concluded, Exxon did not account for proxy costs at all, including for giant, multibillion-dollar projects in Malaysia, Indonesia, and Singapore before 2016.

Mashable Light Speed Want more out-of-this world tech, space and science stories? Sign up for Mashable's weekly Light Speed newsletter. By clicking Sign Me Up, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Thanks for signing up!

What's more, throughout various economic forecasting reports provided to its investors, Exxon used confounding language to explain how they were accounting for the future costs of extracting and selling fossil fuels.

"At a bare minimum, their communications were totally confusing," noted Parenteau. "They used five different terms to describe how they were costing out carbon regulations," including "price of carbon," "cost of carbon," "proxy cost," "GHG cost," and ‘GHG proxy cost.”

Exxon, however, staunchly denies deception and wrongdoing.

"The New York Attorney General’s allegations are false," Steven Soper of Exxon's Corporate Media Relations said via email. "We tell investors through regular disclosures how the company accounts for risks associated with climate change. We are confident in the facts and look forward to seeing our company exonerated in court."

Exxon's doom

Exxon's potential trial downfall hinges on the fact that the state doesn't have to prove the company intended to defraud its investors, only that it made misleading statements that caused investors to incur financial losses, often by losing stock value (this is called "material damage").

And there's evidence Exxon mislead its investors.

"The central fact does not seem to be in dispute: Exxon told investors it was using one proxy cost for carbon, and it was using another. Or sometimes none at all," said Michael Burger executive director of the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law at Columbia University. "That's deception, or misrepresentation."

The trial, which could last three weeks, will debate whether material damage occurred as a result of Exxon's deceptions, explained Burger.

Regardless of the verdict, Exxon is likely to come out an overall loser. The state, by way of the Martin Act, has accessed a wealth of documents showing how the corporation conducts business, and allegedly mislead and defrauded investors about climate change and climate science.

"There's a treasure trove of documents," said Parenteau. "There are tons of documents that we haven’t seen yet that the state has pried out of Exxon.

"The evidence comes to light," added Muffett. "It's a worst-case scenario for the company."

SEE ALSO: California’s climate dystopia comes true

Although Exxon stands to potentially lose over $1 billion in this suit, the greater oil industry will feel ripples from the trial. "The larger damage is to the credibility of the industry," stressed Parenteau, noting that banks and financial markets are no longer going to believe oil companies' optimistic forecasts for massive returns. The oil industry, faced with the cost of selling carbon-rich fuels, will almost certainly be burdened with rising expenses, and they must genuinely account for these costs.

Exxon's time in climate court is likely just starting.

"This speaks to a future of the company that is characterized by non-stop climate litigation for years or decades to come," said Muffett.

0.1251s , 10043.5703125 kb

Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【porno bedava izle】Oil giant Exxon enters New York court for alleged climate fraud,Public Opinion Flash  

Sitemap

Top 主站蜘蛛池模板: 囯产愉拍亚洲精品一区高清午夜永久www乱码 | 国产精品久久国产精品99 | 国产又粗又猛又爽又黄A片漫画 | 亚洲av无码一区二区三区天堂古代 | 麻豆短视频传媒网站 | 日本国产最新一区二区三区 | 无码毛片一区二区三区视频 | 国产综合视频一视频二 | 99热这里只有精品9 99热这里只有精品91 | 在线观看一区二区三区视频 | 亚洲欧洲卡1卡2卡新区2022八 | 久久99AV无色码人妻蜜 | 亚洲欧美在无码片一区二区 | 国产av一区二区三区电影 | 99精品视频在线观看免费蜜桃 | 小小拗女一区二区三区 | 亚洲高清国产拍精品动图 | 97人妻中文字幕无码系列 | 视频一区二区三区日韩在线 | 看国产一级片 | 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爽出水 | 久久青草国产免费观看 | 日本无卡码高清免费视频v 日本无乱码高清在线观看 日本无码H纯肉黄动漫A红桃 | 2024四虎永久在线影院 | 精品无码一区二区三区不卡 | 国产精品爽黄69天堂A片潘金莲 | 四虎成人精品在永久免费 | 国产伦子系列沙发午睡 | 丰满少妇熟妇乱偷人无码 | 国产成人高清免费 | 国产精品二区在线 | 成人午夜电影国产一区二区三 | 精品无码久久久久久久久水蜜桃 | 亚洲乱码国产乱码精华 | 韩国二区亚洲av无码一区二区三区人 | 亚洲国产成人资源在线观看 | 日韩国产在线成人 | 蜜桃视频在线观看免费视频网站WWW | 国产激情艳情在线看视频 | 99久久久无码一区二区 | 欧美亚洲综合高清在线 |