Set as Homepage - Add to Favorites

日韩欧美成人一区二区三区免费-日韩欧美成人免费中文字幕-日韩欧美成人免费观看-日韩欧美成人免-日韩欧美不卡一区-日韩欧美爱情中文字幕在线

【nam di?n viên phim khiêu dam vi?t】Online testing is a biased mess, and senators are demanding answers

We finally know who watches the (exam) watchers.

On Thursday,nam di?n viên phim khiêu dam vi?t six Democratic senators sent an open letter to the CEO of the online test-administering company ExamSoft. At issue are claims online proctoring and remote-testing software is biased against people of color and people with disabilities, and that it invades students' privacy.

"We write to request information on the steps that your company has taken to protect the civil rights of students and ensure that ExamSoft is not creating barriers for students' futures," the senators write.


You May Also Like

For those fortunate enough to not have had their education derailed by the coronavirus pandemic, remote proctoring may be a foreign concept. It some cases, it literally involves a stranger watching you take a test through your webcam ostensibly to guard against cheating. In other instances, an opaque computer-vision system attempts to detect "abnormal exam-taker activity" — whatever that means.

ExamSoft's ExamMonitor feature is one such offering. According to the company's website, it offers a "AI-driven remote proctoring solution that continuously observes exam takers with video and audio monitoring throughout the entire exam."

The ExamMonitor brochure goes into more detail.

"Once the exam has begun, ExamMonitor captures a continuous audio and video recording of the exam taker using both webcam and screen capture," it explains. "Once the exam is completed, the exam footage is uploaded to ExamSoft and analyzed and reviewed by a trained professional."

Allegations that remote proctoring software fails to register Black and brown students as, well, people, have dogged the technology from the start.

Mashable Light Speed Want more out-of-this world tech, space and science stories? Sign up for Mashable's weekly Light Speed newsletter. By clicking Sign Me Up, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Thanks for signing up!

"The @ExamSoft software can't 'recognize' me due to 'poor lighting' even though I'm sitting in a well lit room," wrote one student in September. "Starting to think it has nothing to do with lighting. Pretty sure we all predicted their facial recognition software wouldn't work for people of color."

The letter signatories — Sen. Richard Blumenthal, Sen. Ron Wyden, Sen. Chris Van Hollen, Sen. Tina Smith, Sen. Elizabeth Warren, and Sen. Cory Booker — expounded upon this issue in their Dec. 3 letter.

"Students of color, and students wearing religious dress, like head scarves, have reported issues with the software's inability to recognize their facial features, temporarily barring them from accessing the software," they write. "Just as alarmingly, students have reported egregious situations in which monitoring features have flagged individuals with disabilities or physical conditions, such as tic disorders or muscle reflexes, as suspicious, and in which virtual 'proctors' failed to accommodate students' disabilities."

What's more, the letter raises concerns regarding student privacy — noting that not only in some cases are students, and the interior of their homes, observed by an "unknown virtual proctor," but that students must install software on their computers.

"While all this information can be useful for maintaining integrity in testing and ensuring that student needs are being met, questions remain about where and how this data is being used before, during, and after tests, by both your company, the virtual proctors, and testing administrators," write the senators.

In September, Jason Kelley, the Electronic Frontier Foundation's acting associate director of research, explained over email that remote proctoring software in general is fundamentally flawed.

"In many ways, [remote proctoring] software is indistinguishable from a different, nefarious type of software supposedly used to detect 'cheating' — spouseware," he explained. "Overall, these tools are far more invasive than necessary, they won't necessarily detect cheating, and they will likely exacerbate existing inequities in educational outcomes."

SEE ALSO: Amazon quietly announces major expansion to neighborhood surveillance networks

We reached out to ExamSoft to see if it had a response to the senators' concerns, and if it intends to respond to the letter. We received no immediate response.

The senators are definitely expecting to hear back, however, and have asked that ExamSoft CEO Sabastian Vos respond by Dec. 17. Perhaps he can record, upload, and send along a video of himself doing so to ensure the integrity of the response process.

Topics Cybersecurity Privacy COVID-19

0.2122s , 8093.3515625 kb

Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【nam di?n viên phim khiêu dam vi?t】Online testing is a biased mess, and senators are demanding answers,Public Opinion Flash  

Sitemap

Top 主站蜘蛛池模板: 日本艳星一区二区三区四区 | 国产精品色吧国产精品 | 国产真实乱人偷精品人妻 | 国产69久久精品成人看 | a级免费的大片视频网 | 四虎精品成人免费视频 | 国产免费九九久久精品一区 | 欧美多毛的大隂道 | 欧美一级做a爰片免费 | 国产91精品成人资源在线 | 蜜桃视频无码区在线观看 | 国产精品久久久久久久久久久久久久 | 久热精品在线视频 | 国产婷婷色一区二区三 | 国产成人av区一区 | 成熟了的熟妇毛茸茸 | 亚洲av无码国产一区二区三区 | 成人欧美一区二区三区白人 | 成人av无码国产在线观看 | 日韩国产亚洲高清在线久草 | 国产毛片精品久久完整版 | 午夜高清| 国产精品无码午夜免费麻豆 | 亚洲乱码一二三四区麻豆 | 欧美久久综合九色综合 | 国产肥白大熟妇BBBB | xxxxgay国产偷v国产偷v亚洲高 | 国产亚洲一区二区三区不卡 | 麻豆视频官网 | 99久久免费精品国产免费 | av一区二区三区高清久久 | 国产成人a一在线观看 | 国产综合一区二区三区精品 | 亚洲2022国产成人精品无码区 | 午夜国产一区二区三区精品不卡 | 国产一卡2卡三卡4卡免费 | 免费看美女自慰的网站 | 五月天婷婷天天综合入口 | 2024乱码精品1区2区3区 | 99久久这里只精品麻豆 | 中文欧美久久水蜜桃无码av一区二区 |