Set as Homepage - Add to Favorites

日韩欧美成人一区二区三区免费-日韩欧美成人免费中文字幕-日韩欧美成人免费观看-日韩欧美成人免-日韩欧美不卡一区-日韩欧美爱情中文字幕在线

【nam di?n viên phim khiêu dam vi?t】Online testing is a biased mess, and senators are demanding answers

We finally know who watches the (exam) watchers.

On Thursday,nam di?n viên phim khiêu dam vi?t six Democratic senators sent an open letter to the CEO of the online test-administering company ExamSoft. At issue are claims online proctoring and remote-testing software is biased against people of color and people with disabilities, and that it invades students' privacy.

"We write to request information on the steps that your company has taken to protect the civil rights of students and ensure that ExamSoft is not creating barriers for students' futures," the senators write.


You May Also Like

For those fortunate enough to not have had their education derailed by the coronavirus pandemic, remote proctoring may be a foreign concept. It some cases, it literally involves a stranger watching you take a test through your webcam ostensibly to guard against cheating. In other instances, an opaque computer-vision system attempts to detect "abnormal exam-taker activity" — whatever that means.

ExamSoft's ExamMonitor feature is one such offering. According to the company's website, it offers a "AI-driven remote proctoring solution that continuously observes exam takers with video and audio monitoring throughout the entire exam."

The ExamMonitor brochure goes into more detail.

"Once the exam has begun, ExamMonitor captures a continuous audio and video recording of the exam taker using both webcam and screen capture," it explains. "Once the exam is completed, the exam footage is uploaded to ExamSoft and analyzed and reviewed by a trained professional."

Allegations that remote proctoring software fails to register Black and brown students as, well, people, have dogged the technology from the start.

Mashable Light Speed Want more out-of-this world tech, space and science stories? Sign up for Mashable's weekly Light Speed newsletter. By clicking Sign Me Up, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Thanks for signing up!

"The @ExamSoft software can't 'recognize' me due to 'poor lighting' even though I'm sitting in a well lit room," wrote one student in September. "Starting to think it has nothing to do with lighting. Pretty sure we all predicted their facial recognition software wouldn't work for people of color."

The letter signatories — Sen. Richard Blumenthal, Sen. Ron Wyden, Sen. Chris Van Hollen, Sen. Tina Smith, Sen. Elizabeth Warren, and Sen. Cory Booker — expounded upon this issue in their Dec. 3 letter.

"Students of color, and students wearing religious dress, like head scarves, have reported issues with the software's inability to recognize their facial features, temporarily barring them from accessing the software," they write. "Just as alarmingly, students have reported egregious situations in which monitoring features have flagged individuals with disabilities or physical conditions, such as tic disorders or muscle reflexes, as suspicious, and in which virtual 'proctors' failed to accommodate students' disabilities."

What's more, the letter raises concerns regarding student privacy — noting that not only in some cases are students, and the interior of their homes, observed by an "unknown virtual proctor," but that students must install software on their computers.

"While all this information can be useful for maintaining integrity in testing and ensuring that student needs are being met, questions remain about where and how this data is being used before, during, and after tests, by both your company, the virtual proctors, and testing administrators," write the senators.

In September, Jason Kelley, the Electronic Frontier Foundation's acting associate director of research, explained over email that remote proctoring software in general is fundamentally flawed.

"In many ways, [remote proctoring] software is indistinguishable from a different, nefarious type of software supposedly used to detect 'cheating' — spouseware," he explained. "Overall, these tools are far more invasive than necessary, they won't necessarily detect cheating, and they will likely exacerbate existing inequities in educational outcomes."

SEE ALSO: Amazon quietly announces major expansion to neighborhood surveillance networks

We reached out to ExamSoft to see if it had a response to the senators' concerns, and if it intends to respond to the letter. We received no immediate response.

The senators are definitely expecting to hear back, however, and have asked that ExamSoft CEO Sabastian Vos respond by Dec. 17. Perhaps he can record, upload, and send along a video of himself doing so to ensure the integrity of the response process.

Topics Cybersecurity Privacy COVID-19

0.2122s , 8093.3515625 kb

Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【nam di?n viên phim khiêu dam vi?t】Online testing is a biased mess, and senators are demanding answers,Public Opinion Flash  

Sitemap

Top 主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产精品亚洲日韩au在线 | 成人123 | 国产福利91精品一区二区三区 | 亚洲AV无码久久精品色欲 | 无码一级毛片一区二区视频孕妇 | 国产三级视频 | 另类videosse| 伊人网综合视频 | 丁香五月天俺也去俺来也 | 久久国产乱子伦视频无卡顿 | 久久亚洲精品国产精品黑人 | 中文字幕大香视频蕉免费 | 国产精品视频第一区二区三区 | 亚洲国产精品一区二区久 | 国产69久久精品成人看 | 少妇饥渴放荡的高潮喷水 | 国产精品真人一级a爱做片高潮 | 亚洲日韩欧美一区二区三区 | 日本jizzjizz | 四虎影午夜成年免费精品 | 国产av国片精品无套内谢无码 | 麻豆精品无人区码一二三区别:重塑消费体验 | 精品人妻无码在线小视频 | 日韩精品人成在线播放 | 日本三级免费电影一区二区三区 | 国产三级高清视频在线观看 | 国产免费福利在线视频 | 国产颜射手机在线播放 | 国产熟妇精品一区二区 | 内射囯产旡码丰满少妇 | 99国产精品白浆免费观看 | 国产乱码卡二卡三卡43 | 日韩av无码国产精品一区二区 | a级毛片部免 | 欧美日韩天天精品人人综合 | 亚洲av无码一区二区乱子伦 | 二区久久国产乱子伦免费精品 | 无码精品日本一区二区桃花岛 | 日本成年视频 | AV亚洲AV永久无码精品网 | 人妻互换精品一区二区 |