Set as Homepage - Add to Favorites

日韩欧美成人一区二区三区免费-日韩欧美成人免费中文字幕-日韩欧美成人免费观看-日韩欧美成人免-日韩欧美不卡一区-日韩欧美爱情中文字幕在线

【????? ?????? ??????? ???????? ???? ???? ??? ???? ???????】120 court cases have been caught with AI hallucinations, according to new database

Lawyers representing Anthropic recently got busted for using a false attribution generated by Claude in an expert testimony.

But that's one of more than 20 court cases containing AI hallucinations in the past month alone,????? ?????? ??????? ???????? ???? ???? ??? ???? ??????? according to a new database created by French lawyer and data scientist Damien Charlotin. And those were just the ones that were caught in the act. In 2024, which was the first full year of tracking cases, Charlotin found 36 instances. That jumped up to 48 in 2025, and the year is only half way over. The database, which was created in early May, has 120 entries so far, going back to June 2023.

SEE ALSO: More concise chatbot responses tied to increase in hallucinations, study finds

A database of AI hallucinations in court cases shows the increasing prevalence of lawyers using AI to automate the grunt work of building a case. The second oldest entry in the database is the Mata v. Avianca case which made headlines in May, 2023 when law firm Levidow, Levidow & Oberman got caught citing fake cases generated by ChatGPT.


You May Also Like

The database tracks instances where an AI chatbot hallucinated text, "typically fake citations, but also other types of arguments," according to the site. That means fake references to previous cases, usually as a way of establishing legal precedent. It doesn't account for the use generative AI in other aspects of legal documents. "The universe of cases with hallucinated content is therefore necessarily wider (and I think much wider)," said Charlotin in an email to Mashable, emphasis original.

"In general, I think it's simply that the legal field is a perfect breeding ground for AI-generated hallucinations: this is a field based on load of text and arguments, where generative AI stands to take a strong position; citations follow patterns, and LLMs love that," said Charlotin.

Mashable Light Speed Want more out-of-this world tech, space and science stories? Sign up for Mashable's weekly Light Speed newsletter. By clicking Sign Me Up, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Thanks for signing up!

The widespread availability of generative AI has made it drastically easier to produce text, automating research and writing that could take hours or even days. But in a way, Charlotin said, erroneous or misinterpreted citations for the basis of a legal argument are nothing new. "Copying and pasting citations from past cases, up until the time a citation bears little relation to the original case, has long been a staple of the profession," he said.

The difference, Charlotin noted, is that those copied and pasted citations at least referred to real court decisions. The hallucinations introduced by generative AI refer to court cases that never existed.

Judges and opposing lawyersare always supposed to check citations for their own respective responsibilities in the case. But this now includes looking for AI hallucinations. The increase of hallucinations discovered in cases could be the increasing availability of LLMs, but also "increased awareness of the issue on the part of everyone involved," said Charlotin.

Ultimately, leaning on ChatGPT, Claude, or other chatbots to cite past legal precedents is proving consequential. The penalties for those caught filing documents with AI hallucinations include financial sanctions, formal warnings, and even dismissal of cases.

That said, Charlotin said the penalties have been "mild" so far and the courts have put "the onus on the parties to behave," since the responsibility of checking citations remains the same. "I feel like there is a bit of embarrassment from anyone involved."


Disclosure: Ziff Davis, Mashable’s parent company, in April filed a lawsuit against OpenAI, alleging it infringed Ziff Davis copyrights in training and operating its AI systems.

Topics Artificial Intelligence

0.2115s , 9991.234375 kb

Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【????? ?????? ??????? ???????? ???? ???? ??? ???? ???????】120 court cases have been caught with AI hallucinations, according to new database,Public Opinion Flash  

Sitemap

Top 主站蜘蛛池模板: 51国产偷自视频区 | 巨胸喷奶水www视频网站 | 麻豆国产精品一二三在线观看 | AV无码乱码国产麻豆穿越 | 美女张开腿给男人桶爽久久 | 久久久精品成人国产一区 | 免费乱人伦 | 欧美亚洲中文国产综合 | 久久国产精品久久国产片 | 久久久一本波多野结衣电影 | 精品国产亚洲欧美日韩一区 | 麻豆人妻无码视频 | 国产成人成网站在线播放 | 国产精品亚洲а怡红院 | 美国毛片基地a级e片 | 无码精品人妻一区二区三区免费看 | 中文字幕亚洲综合精品一区 | 国产成人mv在线播放 | 日韩内射美女人妻一区二区三区 | 纯肉小黄文高H | 国内自拍无码区在 | 精品国产乱码久久久久久浪潮 | 午夜福利com | 久久精品综合一区二区三区 | 久久久久亚洲av无码专区首 | 亚洲欧洲另类综合自拍 | 久热免费视频 | 麻豆国产在线精品欧美日韩电影 | 91麻豆精品国产一区色欲 | 麻豆久久久午夜一区二区 | 不卡无码h在线观看 | 91精品日韩 | 国产成人综合久久 | 高潮一区二区三区四区在线播放 | 欧美日韩免费在线观看 | 欧美激情一区二区三区在线播放 | 无码人妻亚洲无码 | 丰满熟女高潮毛茸茸欧洲 | 免费看国产精品麻豆 | 久久国产欧美一区二区三区精品 | 国产精品久久久久久网站 |