Set as Homepage - Add to Favorites

日韩欧美成人一区二区三区免费-日韩欧美成人免费中文字幕-日韩欧美成人免费观看-日韩欧美成人免-日韩欧美不卡一区-日韩欧美爱情中文字幕在线

【????? ?????? ??????? ???????? ???? ???? ??? ???? ???????】120 court cases have been caught with AI hallucinations, according to new database

Lawyers representing Anthropic recently got busted for using a false attribution generated by Claude in an expert testimony.

But that's one of more than 20 court cases containing AI hallucinations in the past month alone,????? ?????? ??????? ???????? ???? ???? ??? ???? ??????? according to a new database created by French lawyer and data scientist Damien Charlotin. And those were just the ones that were caught in the act. In 2024, which was the first full year of tracking cases, Charlotin found 36 instances. That jumped up to 48 in 2025, and the year is only half way over. The database, which was created in early May, has 120 entries so far, going back to June 2023.

SEE ALSO: More concise chatbot responses tied to increase in hallucinations, study finds

A database of AI hallucinations in court cases shows the increasing prevalence of lawyers using AI to automate the grunt work of building a case. The second oldest entry in the database is the Mata v. Avianca case which made headlines in May, 2023 when law firm Levidow, Levidow & Oberman got caught citing fake cases generated by ChatGPT.


You May Also Like

The database tracks instances where an AI chatbot hallucinated text, "typically fake citations, but also other types of arguments," according to the site. That means fake references to previous cases, usually as a way of establishing legal precedent. It doesn't account for the use generative AI in other aspects of legal documents. "The universe of cases with hallucinated content is therefore necessarily wider (and I think much wider)," said Charlotin in an email to Mashable, emphasis original.

"In general, I think it's simply that the legal field is a perfect breeding ground for AI-generated hallucinations: this is a field based on load of text and arguments, where generative AI stands to take a strong position; citations follow patterns, and LLMs love that," said Charlotin.

Mashable Light Speed Want more out-of-this world tech, space and science stories? Sign up for Mashable's weekly Light Speed newsletter. By clicking Sign Me Up, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Thanks for signing up!

The widespread availability of generative AI has made it drastically easier to produce text, automating research and writing that could take hours or even days. But in a way, Charlotin said, erroneous or misinterpreted citations for the basis of a legal argument are nothing new. "Copying and pasting citations from past cases, up until the time a citation bears little relation to the original case, has long been a staple of the profession," he said.

The difference, Charlotin noted, is that those copied and pasted citations at least referred to real court decisions. The hallucinations introduced by generative AI refer to court cases that never existed.

Judges and opposing lawyersare always supposed to check citations for their own respective responsibilities in the case. But this now includes looking for AI hallucinations. The increase of hallucinations discovered in cases could be the increasing availability of LLMs, but also "increased awareness of the issue on the part of everyone involved," said Charlotin.

Ultimately, leaning on ChatGPT, Claude, or other chatbots to cite past legal precedents is proving consequential. The penalties for those caught filing documents with AI hallucinations include financial sanctions, formal warnings, and even dismissal of cases.

That said, Charlotin said the penalties have been "mild" so far and the courts have put "the onus on the parties to behave," since the responsibility of checking citations remains the same. "I feel like there is a bit of embarrassment from anyone involved."


Disclosure: Ziff Davis, Mashable’s parent company, in April filed a lawsuit against OpenAI, alleging it infringed Ziff Davis copyrights in training and operating its AI systems.

Topics Artificial Intelligence

0.2115s , 9991.234375 kb

Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【????? ?????? ??????? ???????? ???? ???? ??? ???? ???????】120 court cases have been caught with AI hallucinations, according to new database,Public Opinion Flash  

Sitemap

Top 主站蜘蛛池模板: 亚洲欧美综合国产精品一区 | 久久免费视屏 | 国产性夜夜春夜夜爽1A片 | aⅴ色国产欧美 | 国产成人精品亚洲精品 | 制服丝袜日韩一区二区三区 | 国产免费久久精品44 | 麻豆精品国产精华精华液好用吗 | 一级网站草莓视频亚洲精品成人小视频 | 久久综合亚洲国产 | 国产精品无码一级免费看a级毛激情 | 无码不卡毛片视频免费播放 | 激情内射亚洲一区二区三区 | 91免费无码国产在线观看 | 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区 | 97综合视频| 精品无码国产自产拍在线观看蜜桃 | av无码精品一区二区三区四区 | 东京热亚洲天堂 | 亚洲网站大全 | 精品交小说合集500篇 | 欧美日本一道高清二区三区 | 国产三级av无码在线一区 | 国产成人亚洲综合色影视 | 欧美婬秽视频在线观看 | 69国产成人精品午夜福中文 | 精品自拍自产一区二区三区 | 亚洲欧美日韩中文字幕在线不卡 | 亚洲情在线最近免费大全免费版视频日 | 精品高清1卡2卡3卡4麻豆 | 色综合久久精品亚洲国产消防 | 久久精品国语 | 国产成人调教在线视频 | 一本色道久久综合亚洲精品蜜桃 | 亚洲丁香婷婷久久一区二区 | 精品国产手机视频在在线 | 一级人做人a爰免费视频 | tv国产变态在线看 | 巨胸爆乳美女露双奶头挤奶 | 国产人妻人伦精品 | 国产成人午夜在线不卡视播放 |